Re: Dispatches from Clown World: Actual NY Times Headline

On 4/1/24 3:02 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

In article <uuegav$2hiti$5@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
 

On 3/31/24 4:31 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

In article <17c1cda372b1642b$139251$3265$48d50260@news.newsdemon.com>,
   trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
>

On 3/30/24 3:59 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

In article <uu9es2$13c3i$14@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
>

On 3/29/24 2:11 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

In article <uu6i8g$b577$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
>

On 3/28/24 1:51 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

In article <uu3uu2$3kj1o$3@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
>

On 3/26/24 2:04 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

In article <6pv50jlju65cqqudaqels4bmif82852roh@4ax.com>,
       shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:

>

He overstated the value to the banks and understated (or stated
correctly) the value to the IRS.

>
The IRS is a federal agency. How does the state of New York have
jurisdiction to prosecute a federal tax case?
>

Where is the Trump Org situated again?

>
Doesn't matter.
>
If the Trump Org engaged in counterfeiting currency, the NY D.A.
wouldn't have authority to prosecute that crime just because the
company is registered in New York. Counterfeiting is a federal
crime and the state doesn't have jurisdiction over it.

>

But he didn't. He screwed the people and New York.

>
If the company passed counterfeit currency in New York, it would have
screwed the people of New York. If the company passed counterfeit
currency at city-run facilities, that would have screwed over the
government of New York. That still wouldn't give New York jurisdiction
over a federal crime.

>
No response here, I see. Convenient.
>

He screwed New York, not the Federal Government.

>
Jurisdiction is not determined by who was "screwed over", dipshit.

>

Crime committed in NY. It cheated the taxpayers and banks in NY...
dum-dum.

>
So why was the 9-11 investigation and prosecutions FBI and federal court
jurisdiction?
>
Crime committed in NY. It killed the people and destroyed the buildings
in NY...

>

https://www.congress.gov/107/plaws/publ56/PLAW-107publ56.htm
>
    To deter and punish terrorist acts in the United States and around the
     world, to enhance law enforcement investigatory tools, and for other
               purposes. <<NOTE: Oct. 26, 2001 -  [H.R. 3162]>>
>
       Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America <<NOTE: Uniting and Strengthening America by
Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism
(USA PATRIOT ACT) Act of 2001.>> in Congress assembled,

>
Looky there, Effa. Even Hutt knows why the federal government, not the
state of New York, prosecuted the 9-11 crimes.
>
When you find yourself more ignorant than Hutt, that should be one of
those watershed moments in life that cause you to do some serious
self-reflection.

 

9-11 was a federal crime.

 So is evading federal taxes and lying to the IRS.
 Oops...

Damn, Oath Keeper Twat, you're really giving me a swelled head now. Apparently you're so terrified of me you can only respond to me by mentions in response to other people.  I can't even imagine how scared shitless you must be when I respond to you directly.