Re: "Speak Out Loudly Against This Evil": Internet Erupts Over Biden Declaring Easter "Trans Day Of Visibility"

On Tue, 02 Apr 2024 04:46:21 -0400
shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:

On Mon, 01 Apr 2024 23:34:59 -0700, The Horny Goat <lcraver@home.ca>
wrote:
 

On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 04:30:44 -0400, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net>
wrote:
 

“I have as low an opinion of Biden as you can possibly have and yet
this is so outrageously evil that I had to check to make sure it
was real. It is,” Daily Wire host and author Matt Walsh said. “Our
‘catholic’ president has chosen the highest holiday on the
Christian calendar to celebrate transgenderism. This man is a
demon.” 

>
That's an exaggeration but no question, were I an American I'd vote
for anybody BUT Biden solely on the basis of that. 

 
Then you would be as foolish as the MAGA faithful I see making a fuss
over this. The day has always

Always? As in "since the dawn of time"? Really? I would think it hasn't
been anywhere NEAR that long.

been celebrated on March 31st. It just
so happens that this year Easter Sunday also happens to be on March
31st. So it isn't like Biden or anyone else was doing something
against Christianity.
 

I have no particular problem with him setting such a day on any other
day but to do it on the highest high holy day on the Christian
calendar shows a level of insensitivity unworthy of any candidate for
high office. I wouldn't do it on Yom Kippur or Eid either. 

 
I wonder what Jesus would say about the intolerance being exposed
here. Sure seems to go against some of the tenets of Christianity to
me.

Remind me where Jesus supported trans-folk in the Bible....

And to do it in an election year even marks it as either just plain
stupidity OR an allegiance to an agenda that is completely out of
touch with his nation. 

 
Or he's not playing politics with the subject by attempting to move
the celebration to another day. Not that he could move the day since
it isn't a national holiday but one that was setup by a trans advocate
and appears to be supported by GLADD. (At least as far as I know
there's no federal support for the day other than recognizing it
exists.)

If you want to be president you simply have to avoid unforced errors
like that. Moral of the story is this move was either highly stupid
or highly evil and I for one wouldn't want a president who was
either.
>
Somehow I don't see Eisenhower, Kennedy Johnson or even Nixon doing
that!
>
Now let's be clear I'm NOT a fan of his GOP competition either so I
would guess there are at least 50 million Americans who in 7 months
time will go to the ballot box wishing either party had nominated
most 

anybody<< else. 

--
Rhino