Re: Christians getting it wrong

On 4/7/2024 9:31 AM, The Horny Goat wrote:

On Sat, 6 Apr 2024 16:17:16 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman"
<ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
 

You're missing my point. The people who want to impose religion upon
civil life want to do so through legislation and the courts, and they
have failed at times, succeeded at other times.

 As well they should have. As opposed to the kid reading his Bible in
the cafeteria at lunch silently and alone.
 

Under such circumstances, in order for the state to remain neutral on
religion, it must prevent such people from imposing religious doctrine
upon others. Those who are so restrict are not freely exercising
religion given that they do not believe that other people are free to
have their own creed.

 Agreed. I have my own beliefs and while I'd be delighted to see more
folks adopt them the public square is not the place to encourage them
to do so.
 

"We've always led attendees in prayer during ceremonies of the public
high school. Why cannot we continue to offer a prayer at the upcoming
graduation?"
>
It's unconstitutional to do so even though those who want public prayer
are restricted from freely exercising their own religion.

 While Christianity by its nature is expansionist (Jesus' last words
are said to have been 'go forth and make disciples of all nations')

Unless they weren't his words. The bible has been extensively rewritten and edited to fit the narrative the Church wanted.

there are definitely places where it's appropriate and others where
its not. Part of being a mature human being is understanding what's
appropriate and what's not in all sorts of situations in life. And to
know there are situations where you have to work out the solutions on
general principles.
 That's why my dog's collar includes a role of small plastic bags and
why I am grateful to reach a 'bear bin' on the course of his walk.