Liste des Groupes | Revenir à ra tv |
On 4/7/24 1:32 PM, BTR1701 wrote:Elsewhere, I posted an authoritative quote to the effect that an opinion may contain several -- sometimes differing -- opinions. So, what an opinion "is" seems arguably to be just a matter of... well, you know...moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:More bullshit from the fake lawyer.On 4/6/2024 11:21 PM, BTR1701 wrote:>In article <17c3e0882b0394ca$5560$3037545$10d55a65@news.newsdemon.com>,>
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
>On 4/6/2024 2:41 PM, BTR1701 wrote:>In article <17c3b829d977a4bb$361$1351842$40d50a60@news.newsdemon.com>,>
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
>On 4/5/2024 7:11 PM, BTR1701 wrote:>On Apr 5, 2024 at 3:57:07 PM PDT, "moviePig" <never@nothere.com> wrote:
>On 4/5/2024 4:30 PM, BTR1701 wrote:moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:>>>>What *opinion* -- of anything anywhere -- can't be contradicted? Fyi,>
*that* would be a violation of 'free speech'...
No one's muzzling or prohibiting you from making contradictory
statements regarding the SCOTUS ruling. However, your right to free
speech doesn't immunize you from being wrong or bar others from pointing
out your wrongness.
...where "wrongness" means "of differing opinion".
You can have an opinion that SCOTUS decided wrongly and wish it had made a
different ruling but you can't have an opinion that the law is other than
it is.
The 'law' is what SCOTUS has opinions about. I can have *my* opinion
about either or both. Therein, the only "wrong" would be a misquoting.
No, the law is what it is and it's not what you claim. You can have your
own opinions but you can't have your own facts.
No? The law *isn't* text that SCOTUS has opinions about? ...as I may?
No, SCOTUS opinions become the law.
Including the dissenting ones?
The dissent isn't the opinion of the Court.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/opinions.aspx
Opinions
The term “opinions” as used on this website refers to several types of writing by the Justices.
The most well-known opinions are those released or announced in cases in which the Court has heard oral argument. Each opinion sets out the Court’s judgment and its reasoning and may include the majority or principal opinion as well as any concurring or dissenting opinions. All opinions in a single case are published together and are prefaced by a syllabus prepared by the Reporter of Decisions that summarizes the Court’s decision. The Justice who authors the majority or principal opinion often will summarize the opinion from the bench during a Court session.
The Court may also dispose of cases in per curiam opinions, which do not identify the author. These cases frequently resolve cases summarily, often without oral argument. But per curiam opinions have sometimes been issued in argued cases.
In-chambers opinions are written by an individual Justice to dispose of an application by a party for interim relief, e.g., for a stay of the judgment of the court below, for vacation of a stay, or for a temporary injunction.
Justices may also write opinions relating to the orders of the Court, e.g., to dissent from a denial of certiorari or to concur in that denial.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.