Re: Meet U.N. "Climate Advisor" Ayisha Siddiqa...

On 4/8/24 4:08 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

In article <uv0vg6$3hsmc$5@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
 

On 4/5/24 3:29 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:

On 4/4/24 8:50 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

In article <uuneea$uqll$2@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
>

On 4/4/24 3:13 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

In article <uum8rd$ln18$3@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
>

On 4/3/24 11:11 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

>

Ayisha Siddiqa (@Ayishas12), a climate adviser for the UN.
>
https://x.com/libsoftiktok/status/1775191286032523366?s=20
>
She claims the "white man" and "capitalism" are responsible for
bringing life to "the verge of extinction" and calls white men
killers, looters, and abusers. Her account is filled with hateful
anti-white posts.
>
Apparently, it's totally fine to be disgustingly racist against
white people if you work at the United Nations.
>
Why are we funding these racist clowns with our tax dollars? The
United States should simply withdraw from the U.N., send these
bigoted assholes back to their shithole countries, and retrofit
U.N. Plaza to house our homeless veterans.

>

Libs of Tik Tok. That's all I need to say.

>
LOL!
>
Because posting other people's self-owns somehow invalidates those
self-owns.
>

Posting racists and book banners, you mean.

>
Ayisha Siddiqa is a racist, I'll grant you, but what books has she
banned?
>

"Raichik has left up scores of tweets denying the existence of systemic
racism.

>
Cool. Now answer the question I asked.
>
The day after Juneteenth 2021, Raichikšs account posted a

callout to her followers, asking them to reply with one word and she
would try to find a video saying why that word is racist.

>
So she finds various videos from leftists claiming almost any word you can
think of is racist and she's racist for posting them?
>
Oooo-kay, Jan.
>

 

 So now you're a racist if you don't automatically agree with whatever
racism claims leftist make? That's in an interesting take. Insane, but
interesting.
 

Nope.  I forgot you can't read.  "She's racist because she holds racist opinions." is a simple concept to grasp, even for you.

Slate scrolled through thousands of Raichik’s tweets, including hundreds of deleted tweets, to understand how one real estate agent could gain such clout and to try to discern her next targets. One notable trend was clear: Raichik’s feed is colored by an intense hostility to liberals generally, but she holds an especially pronounced animosity toward LGBTQ people, city dwellers, and Black people who have been killed at the hands of police.

The same week that Raichik said she started “the tik tok thing,” Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin was convicted of murdering George Floyd. Prior to his conviction, Raichik had focused on a different flavor of right-wing content under other usernames. But around the time the verdict came down, Raichik let her apparent views on police violence be known: Floyd was a criminal and his death was the result of drug use, not Chauvin’s brutality, she made clear in a series of tweets.
 Raichik’s apparent hostility for Black victims of police violence didn’t end with Floyd. She also tweeted repeatedly mocking the killing of 16-year-old Ma’Khia Bryant, and in another video, the account endorsed random police brutality.

So you can go right out and fuck right off.  She's a goddamned racist because she holds racist opinions.
Just. Like. I. Proved.
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2022/04/chaya-raichik-libs-tiktok-groomer-tweets.html
--
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC Bible  25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0
Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0