Sujet : Re: Cating Agency Quits TULSA KING Over Stallone's Mocking of Extras
De : never (at) *nospam* nothere.com (moviePig)
Groupes : rec.arts.tvDate : 14. Apr 2024, 04:34:06
Autres entêtes
Organisation : NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
Message-ID : <17c604db67ea34eb$13239$197378$4ed50460@news.newsdemon.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 4/13/2024 6:50 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article <17c5f73d383498b3$1266$181469$48d50260@news.newsdemon.com>,
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 4/13/2024 5:19 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
In article
<17c5efd2ed4e684b$56199$3349862$52d51861@news.newsdemon.com>,
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
>
On 4/13/2024 3:36 PM, trotsky wrote:
On 4/13/24 11:05 AM, moviePig wrote:
On 4/13/2024 3:33 AM, trotsky wrote:
>
Do you follow mpig's "logic" of "he gets a pass if he's only an
asshole in private." Here's a hint: why be an asshole in the first
place?
>
I say lots of things in private that'd be "insensitive" if public.
>
Cool, you and Stallone have something in common then.
>
Speaking plainly when possible, for instance.
>
Hahahahahahahahahaha!
>
Irony meters across the world just exploded.
>
Shouldn't that trope have left the nest by now?
As long as you can continue to refer to Godwin with a straight face, all
bets are off.
Umm, I don't remember when I last mentioned 'Godwin'. Even then, I'll bet it was an explicitly self-aware reference like yours right here.
Re: Cating Agency Quits TULSA KING Over Stallone's Mocking of Extras
Re: Cating Agency Quits TULSA KING Over Stallone's Mocking of Extras
