Liste des Groupes | Revenir à ra tv |
On Wed, 17 Apr 2024 11:39:21 -0700, anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net>It's still more entertaining than "Shang-Chi".
wrote:Ian J. Ball <ijball@mac.invalid> wrote:Agreed. I don't know how anyone can think the ETERNALS is anythingOn 4/17/24 8:56 AM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:>Dimensional Traveler <dtravel@sonic.net> wrote:>
>Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings (DVR)>
"Shang-Chi, the master of weaponry-based Kung Fu, is forced to confront
his past after being drawn into the Ten Rings organization." (IMDb)
Part of the Next Generation of the MCU after Infinity Stones war.Super Trivia!>Simu Liu, when cast as Shang-Chi, was knowledgeable in taekwondo,>
gymnastics, and Wing Chun. For his role as the Master of Kung Fu, Liu
trained in tai chi, wushu, Muay Thai, pencak silat, Krav Maga,
jiu-jitsu, boxing, and street fighting.Simu Liu put on 10 lbs. of muscle to play Shang-Chi.>The filmmakers cite Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon (2000), Kung Fu>
Hustle (2004), Tai Chi Master (1993), the The Matrix (1999) series,
Donnie Yen's "Ip Man" films and Jackie Chan films as an influence on the
martial arts action. Michelle Yeoh starred in Crouching Tiger, Hidden
Dragon.The producers for the film briefly discussed the idea of Ant-Man>
appearing in the film due to both him and Shang-Chi living in San
Francisco, but ultimately decided it would derail from the main story.The bus fight is loosely inspired both by Jackie Chan and Buster Keaton.>The 25th film of the Marvel Cinematic Universe.>Shang-Chi is the first superhero film with an Asian leading protagonist>
for Marvel Studios.The final film features over 1,700 visual effects shots.>Although there were many opportunities in the screenplay, the Wilhelm>
Scream was not used in this film for a falling or injured character.
Pretend you heard it from me when you mentioned the number of effects
shots. How many are there in a Jackie Chan movie fight scene? That would
be none whatsoever. What's the point in learning how to fight in so many
styles when it's just going to be a special effect?
>
You almost tempted me.
I thought it was just OK.
>
IIRC, I was actually more engrossed by "Eternals", which may actually be
slightly underrated by this point.
No. No, it’s not. It’s a lousy movie is the best that can be said for it.
And a few are at all familiar with the source material. It’s a dreadful
movie.
other than bad. Sure, there were some interesting ideas behind the
movie but it never came together.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.