Re: Gov. Katie Hobbs (D Arizona) vetoes bill allowing police to arrest trespassers falsely claiming to be tenants

On Mon, 29 Apr 2024 17:04:23 -0700, FPP wrote:

On 4/29/24 3:56 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

In article<v0orib$1tvca$1@dont-email.me>,
"Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com>  wrote:
>

It looked like Arizona was going to stand up for property owners dealing
with trespassers falsely claiming to be tenants that police won't
arrest. But the governor vetoed the bill.

>
From what I've read, she pretty much vetoes everything the legislature
sends to her desk. She holds the record for most vetoes by a governor in
Arizona history. I'm assuming it's a political thing-- the legislature
is full of Republicans, she's a Democrat, so she just rejects everything
they do.
>
In this case, hopefully it will blow back in her face, since both the
legislature-- Dems and Reps alike-- support the bill, as does the public
overwhelmingly. She's the only one stamping her foot and throwing a
tantrum over it. I mean, honestly, what is her version of Garrett
thinking? "Governor, taking the side of people who are stealing homes
from innocent people isn't a very good look for you. Maybe let's not
veto this one?"

>
Yeah, I see the abortion issue really blowing back into the Democrats in
the upcoming elections.

Your diversionary comment might accidentally be actually
relevant. With House-breaking decriminalized there will
be more rapes, and consequently, a greater need for the
Right To Abortion.

>
We might just run out of offices to win.

Strange, but the opposition [party] has an edge
as the leading [party] violates campaign promises.