Liste des Groupes | Revenir à ra tv |
On 5/13/24 5:33 PM, BTR1701 wrote:He's been on a typo tear, lately. I think he's sundowning...In article <v1u2bf$3n232$1@dont-email.me>,A couple of things: a) you misspelled "livelihoods"...
moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>On 5/13/2024 4:35 PM, BTR1701 wrote:>In article <v1tp0v$3krav$1@dont-email.me>,>
moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>On 5/13/2024 1:47 PM, BTR1701 wrote:>In article <v1tb17$3hi6h$1@dont-email.me>,>
moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>On 5/12/2024 10:59 PM, BTR1701 wrote:>In article <v1rtuq$37l07$1@dont-email.me>,>
moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>On 5/12/2024 7:01 PM, BTR1701 wrote:>On May 12, 2024 at 3:54:42 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com>>
wrote:
>On 5/12/2024 6:16 PM, BTR1701 wrote:>In article <v1lpp9$1gnv5$1@dont-email.me>,>
moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:On 5/10/2024 1:56 PM, BTR1701 wrote:Ask the people who were injured from the jab whether they think theAnd now the Scarf Lady, Dr. Deborah Birx, says that thousands of>
Americans could be injured from the mRNA Wuhan Flu shot and that
some groups should not have been forced to get the jab.
>
Weird how she wasn't saying that when Biden's decree was "take the
shot or you're fired" in the federal government. Back then, she
and your vaunted 'fact checkers' would only repeat the mantra that
it's 'safe and effective'.
You mean it *shouldn't* have been called safe and effective?...
government should have told them it was safe.
I'm asking what a responsible public health official ought to have
said.
How about the truth?
The truth is that every medical procedure *including NO procedure*
carries some risk.
And an ethical medical professional explains the type and extent of that
risk, as well as its frequency of occurrence in the population.
>
They don't ignore the risk and just tell you "it's safe and effective".
(And don't forget the denigration and censorship of anyone who suggested
otherwise, who have yet again turned out to be right in the end.)
People who know there's always a small risk don't need to be told. And
people who *don't* know it will grossly overreact when they *are* told.
So once again, it's okay for the government to lie to us for our own
good.So, the public at large heard "safe and effective", which, in context,
the vaccine very much was. Meanwhile, one needn't support censorship to
strongly disapprove of sensationalist life-threatening disinformation.
Once again, real-world decisions appear simplest to those who don't have
to make them. But happily, in this instance, the vaccine *was* safe.
Except for the people who were injured by it.
This just in: Don't risk getting out of bed tomorrow...
This just in: People have a right to know all the risks of drugs they're
not just being asked to take, but ordered to take under threat of loss
of their livelihood.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.