Re: Cuomo Recants on Ivermectin

On Thu, 30 May 2024 16:13:45 -0400, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
wrote:

On 5/30/2024 3:05 PM, shawn wrote:

On Thu, 30 May 2024 18:39:59 +0000, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
 

On May 30, 2024 at 10:03:33 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>

On 5/30/2024 12:02 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

  In article <v3a3do$1nurk$2@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
  wrote:
 

  On 5/29/24 3:15 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

 

  Fired CNN anchor Chris Cuomo, who, along with the rest of the media,
  mocked and derided anyone taking Ivermectin (remember how they called
  it "horse paste"?) to treat the Wuhan Flu is singing a different tune
  now.
>
  https://youtu.be/yYjH5g9ogXE?t=902

 

  Yeah. He's not on CNN any more, and can be as crazy as he wants.

 
  LOL! It's hilarious how the Left considers these guys the sages of our
  modern age until they say something to counter the Agenda, then they're
  immediately branded batshit crazy and dismissed.
 

  He just indicated that RFK Jr. should be at the debate.

 
  He should be if he has a significant amount of support.

>
The "significance" of RFK's support is that it could sink Biden, and not
even remotely that it could elect RFK.

>
"Bad for Biden" is not a reason to exclude a candidate from a debate.
>

 
No, but it is a reason why many may be glad he is excluded. If for no
other reason then it would take time away from the two candidates who
actually do have a real chance of being elected President of the USA.
What is a good reason to exclude him is if he can't reach the terms
required of the debate. I'm not sure what terms are in place now but
in the past I believe a candidate needed to be reaching around 15-16%
in various polls to be considered as a participant in the debates.
Something that RFK Jr isn't able to do.
 
My two cents is I would sort of like to have him in a real debate if
only to demonstrate some of his ideas to the populace. Which I would
think would either attract some of the weaker Trump supporters or
cause people to decide not to vote for RFK Jr. I know people talk
about him drawing support from Biden but I'm not that sure it would
happen if people saw more of RFK Jr.

>
If it could be shown RFK Jr.'s not a complete nutter (a meme I haven't
personally vetted), I'd certainly vote for him over the other two in a
potentially close contest -- but that's not what we have.
>

In a full on debate I don't think that's possible. In a limited
discussion RFK Jr comes off as perfectly competent, but I think when
you get into a wider discussion the crazy bits begin to show.