Re: What Did You Watch? 2015-07-05 (Sunday)

In article <atropos-A6FE3E.20455107072015@news.giganews.com> BTR1701
<atropos@mac.com> wrote:

In article <9m1ppad1e6drboiv7sr7o2lpu34ed1rs95@4ax.com>,
 Hunter <<buffhunter@my-deja.com>> wrote:
 

On Mon, 6 Jul 2015 09:03:19 -0400, Obveeus <Obveeus@aol.com> wrote:
 

On 7/6/2015 4:30 AM, Ubiquitous wrote:
>

What did you watch?

>
HUMANS: The leader of the 'alive' robots is indeed himself a robot.
The government healthcare system has been rewriting the rules of robot
servitude such that the robots can force uncooperative patients to
follow medical orders.

----
That's the National Health Service for you (its a real British
government department)!

>
Prostitute robot draws the line at pretend kiddy porn... making
her the second 'alive' robot that has motherly instincts.

----
I don't think you have to have motherly instincts to be appalled at
child porn. That said maybe that is how one can channel a child
molester's drives.

 
I wonder if it would be illegal for kiddie diddlers to make/use a
child-sized synth for their proclivities?

Well, I guess this question has been definitively answered. This is a
Kentucky law but it has a federal equivalent as well.

https://kentuckylantern.com/briefs/knowingly-owning-child-sex-dolls-one-s
tep-closer-to-being-a-felony-in-kentucky/