Re: Kamala Outright Lies About Women's Basketball Brackets

On 2024-06-04 01:26:20 +0000, Adam H. Kerman said:

super70s  <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:

On 2024-06-03 19:59:19 +0000, Adam H. Kerman said:
 

super70s  <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:

On 2024-06-02 13:27:33 +0000, FPP said:
 

On 6/1/24 1:14 PM, super70s wrote:

On 2024-05-31 10:21:51 +0000, FPP said:
 

On 5/30/24 12:05 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

In article <v3a3ra$1o1jk$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
 

On 5/29/24 4:19 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

 

Kamala Harris claimed that women's basketball wasn't even

allowed to have

playoff brackets until 2022, when in reality, women's

basketball has been

using them since 1982, 42 years.
 Kamala herself tweeted out exchanges with her husband in 2021

where they

talked about who they were choosing in their brackets.
 https://youtu.be/yYjH5g9ogXE?t=409
 Between Biden's almost weekly made-up stories about his past and Kamala
gaslighting us about women's basketball, what the hell is going

on in the

White House?

 

Now tell the rest of the story, coward. But you won't, so I'll have to
do it again.
 

Mediaite reached out to the Vice President's office for

clarification and

was told that Harris did, in fact, misspeak and that she meant to

say that

the use of the "March Madness" copyright was only made available to the
women's tournament lin 2022.

 Hahahahahahahahahaha!
 "Misspeak". That's politician code for "lie".
 

Feel better now, Bunky? She owned up to her mistake and explained it.
Something you or any of your Oathkeeper buddies would have the stones
to do.

 Just like you refuse to do in the UNRWA thread.

  Really. You need to learn how to read.
 You don't seem to mind outright lying and felony convictions, but if
someone owns up to a mistake, you can't abide that.

 A women's basketball gaffe? This is what you call scraping the bottom
of the barrel for some "gotcha" moment.
 

 Everyone know being wrong about college basketball is the same as rape,
fraud, election interference, witness tampering, insurrection, stealing
classified documents, obstruction of justice etc.
 It's all equal to our resident Oathkeeper lawyer.

 Yes I'm sure Adam H. Kerman, Esq. would agree. Even if he does need to
buff up on his copyright and trademark case law.

 Still contributing STOOPID rather than actual discussion, Dear
Sockpuppet.

 That's the second time you've said that, who am I supposed to be a
"sockpuppet" of?
 

Go for it. Name the aspect of either trademark or copyright law that
would prevent the women's sport of intercollegiate athletics from having
a system of playoffs created to meet the needs of their sport.

 Haven't you thoroughly embarrassed yourself enough with the "it's too
generic a concept to be trademarked" boner? That's all I was referring
to.

 I didn't correct the spokesflak use of "trademark" rather than
"copyright"; that was BTR1701.

I quoted you exactly, quit blaming him.

You're still ducking the question. Clearly you cannot answer because you
are ignorant as fuck.

No pal it's you who's ignorant as fuck because you claimed "college women's basketball['s] playoff structure....[is] too generic a concept to be trademarked" and moviepig gave you a cite that proved you were clearly wrong.
Don't get mad at me because you screwed up with some generic claim that was easily disproved.

 I still want to know why you believe that women's
college basketball couldn't have "playoff brackets" till they had
permission from the trademark holder.

Is that what you still want to know? Well that's not the issue at hand and nothing I ever put forth. Go argue with someone who said that. <sheesh>