Liste des Groupes | Revenir à ra tv |
On 2024-06-04 12:05:50 +0000, Adam H. Kerman said:
>super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:explained it.On 2024-06-04 01:26:20 +0000, Adam H. Kerman said:super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:On 2024-06-03 19:59:19 +0000, Adam H. Kerman said:super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:On 2024-06-02 13:27:33 +0000, FPP said:On 6/1/24 1:14 PM, super70s wrote:On 2024-05-31 10:21:51 +0000, FPP said:On 5/30/24 12:05 PM, BTR1701 wrote:FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:On 5/29/24 4:19 PM, BTR1701 wrote:Kamala Harris claimed that women's basketball wasn't even
allowed to have playoff brackets until 2022, when in reality,
women's basketball has been using them since 1982, 42 years.Kamala herself tweeted out exchanges with her husband in
2021 where they talked about who they were choosing in their
brackets.https://youtu.be/yYjH5g9ogXE?t=409Between Biden's almost weekly made-up stories about his past
and Kamala gaslighting us about women's basketball, what the
hell is going on in the White House?Now tell the rest of the story, coward. But you won't, so I'll
have to do it again.Mediaite reached out to the Vice President's office for
clarification and was told that Harris did, in fact, misspeak
and that she meant to say that the use of the "March Madness"
copyright was only made available to the women's tournament
in 2022.Hahahahahahahahahaha!"Misspeak". That's politician code for "lie".Feel better now, Bunky? She owned up to her mistake andthe stonesSomething you or any of your Oathkeeper buddies would have>to do.Just like you refuse to do in the UNRWA thread.Really. You need to learn how to read.You don't seem to mind outright lying and felony convictions, but if
someone owns up to a mistake, you can't abide that.A women's basketball gaffe? This is what you call scraping the bottom
of the barrel for some "gotcha" moment.Everyone know being wrong about college basketball is the same as rape,
fraud, election interference, witness tampering, insurrection, stealing
classified documents, obstruction of justice etc.It's all equal to our resident Oathkeeper lawyer.Yes I'm sure Adam H. Kerman, Esq. would agree. Even if he does need to
buff up on his copyright and trademark case law.Still contributing STOOPID rather than actual discussion, Dear
Sockpuppet.That's the second time you've said that, who am I supposed to be a
"sockpuppet" of?Go for it. Name the aspect of either trademark or copyright law that
would prevent the women's sport of intercollegiate athletics from having
a system of playoffs created to meet the needs of their sport.Haven't you thoroughly embarrassed yourself enough with the "it's too
generic a concept to be trademarked" boner? That's all I was referring
to.I didn't correct the spokesflak use of "trademark" rather than
"copyright"; that was BTR1701.I quoted you exactly, quit blaming him.
Not "blaming" him. I'm telling you, factually, that BTR1701 is the one who
corrected the spokesflak's improper use of "copyright". This is yet another
instance of you getting something wrong, then insisting that you didn't,
but still running your idiotic mouth. I was addressing the issue of the
concept of playoff brackets being so generic that it CANNOT be claimed
as copyright or trademark to prevent women's college sports from using it.
You're still ducking the question. Clearly you cannot answer because you
are ignorant as fuck.No pal it's you who's ignorant as fuck because you claimed "college
women's basketball['s] playoff structure....[is] too generic a concept
to be trademarked" and moviepig gave you a cite that proved you were
clearly wrong.Don't get mad at me because you screwed up with some generic claim that
was easily disproved.
You're running your mouth. You failed to "easily disprove" my statement.
Let's hear your proof. Now. Otherwise, withdraw.
You've already been provided with "proof," jackass. It isn't my fault
you're too ignorant and/or pig-headed to accept it.
I still want to know why you believe that women's
college basketball couldn't have "playoff brackets" till they had
permission from the trademark holder.
Is that what you still want to know? Well that's not the issue at hand
and nothing I ever put forth. Go argue with someone who said that.
<sheesh>
Your incredible ignorance and contribution of STOOPID in lieu of
discussion IS the issue at hand. In fact, you repeated it AGAIN in this
very followup.
Post your argument or shut the fuck up and withdraw. You can't do it
because you are too stupid to understand anything. All you can do is run
your stupid mouth.
ya ya ya ya....Rant on, fool.
NOBODY CARES about some ESOTERIC BUG you have up your ass and your
running UNJUSTIFED VENDETTAS against other posters.
I rarely shitcan people but I think your extremely hostile and arrogant
ass is long overdue.
<plonk>
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.