Re: Cruz Destroys Gender Activist Judge During Hearing

On Jun 10, 2024 at 4:21:06 AM PDT, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:

On 6/8/24 9:48 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

 On Jun 7, 2024 at 5:51:24 AM PDT, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
 

 On 6/4/24 5:09 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

   On Jun 4, 2024 at 8:25:10 AM PDT, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
  

   On 6/3/24 10:35 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

     In article <v3llcv$3kpo$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
     wrote:
    

     On 6/3/24 2:22 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

     In article <v3kipd$3u0gd$5@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
     wrote:
 

     On 6/2/24 10:05 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

     FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:

     On 6/2/24 3:26 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

    

     So when you said you don't talk about another state's governor because
     he doesn't affect your life... that was... wait for it... a lie.

 
     How does eating out affect my life?
 
     Now, trying to destroy capitalism and education in the country is
     another matter.

 
     Your own words: another state's governor doesn't affect my life.
 
     Weird how you're now claiming some governors have the power to
do exactly
     that by "destroying capitalism and education" throughout the entire
     country by signing laws that only apply to their respective states. How
     does DeSantis signing an education bill that only applies to Florida
     affect your life, Effa?

    
     Still no answer here.
    

     But for some reason when Newsom signs laws, according to Effa the Hutt,
     he only has the power to affect California, despite the fact
that in many
     cases, he actually does affect the whole country with his bullshit. Like
     when he banned all gas-powered vehicles by 2035. That affects the whole
     country because California is such a large percentage of the car market,
     vehicle manufacturers conform their products to California standards
     regardless of where they'll eventually be sold.

 

     Newsom went out to eat.

 
     Newsom did exactly what Cruz did that gets your panties in a twist: he
     went on vacation while his state was in crisis. And he did it twice.
     Cruz only did it once.
 

     DeSantis is destroying a state.

 
     Not your state. Doesn't affect your life. Your words.

    

     Nope. False equivalence.
 
     Newsom owned up to it.

    
     Newsom never 'owned up' to fleeing the state for vacation. Once he got
     caught, he admitted his maskless indoor dining at the French Laundry was
     wrong. But he never gave a mea culpa for being on vacation in Cabo while
     he his state was on fire.
    

   You guys caused the fires, ignoring climate change.

  
   To quote our newest Hutt: Nope.
  
   This nonsense that the California wildfires are due to 'climate change' is
   ridiculous. Even Emperor Newsom has admitted that historically bad forest
   management at both the federal and state level is a major factor in the
   severity and frequency of the most recent wildfires.
  
   Anyone who thinks that if we'd all just installed more solar panels and
rode
   our bikes to work, that the state wouldn't be on fire every year is
 completely
   delusional. And these idiotic media reporters and politicians who keep
 saying
   that the amount of acreage burned in California in 2019-- the worst fire
 year
   (2.2 million acres)-- is 'record-breaking' and 'unprecedented' are
 bald-faced
   liars. It's fucking factually completely untrue.
  
   Before the 1800s, California would see anywhere from 5 to 14 million acres
   burn EVERY YEAR. That's 12% of the state burning every year. Before there
 were
   any SUVs or 'climate change'. Just as there were massive droughts in
   California long before the era of 'climate change'. California had a
 500-year
   drought between 800 and 1300 AD. These are documented scientific facts,
but
   that undermines the Agenda, so we get flat-out lies from politicians
 claiming
   this is unprecedented, which goes completely unchallenged by their media
   lackeys.
  
   Excess timber comes out of a forest in only one of two ways. It's either
   carried out or it burns up. We used to carry it out. It was called
logging.
 We
   had healthy forests and a thriving timber economy. Then in the 70s, we
began
   imposing a shit-ton of environmental laws-- both at the state and federal
   level-- that have made it all but impossible and wildly unprofitable to
 carry
   out that timber and what we've seen over those decades is increasingly
 severe
   forest fires.
  
   We've had an 80% decline in timber harvested out of California forests
since
   1980 and we've had 85% increase in acres destroyed by fire over that same
   period. The mismanagement has gotten to the point where you can tell the
   boundary between private forestland that is not affected by these laws and
 the
   public lands that are. The burn scars follow the property lines almost
 exactly
   in many cases.
  
   Wow, the climate sure is clever to only change over the public lands and
 burn
   them while leaving the private lands alone, isn't it?
  
   An untended forest will grow and grow until it chokes itself off. When
there
   are too many trees for the land to support, they start dying off, and that
   dead timber becomes thousands of square miles of fuel, just waiting to be
 set
   ablaze. California currently has four times the timber density that the
land
   can support. Even the reliably leftist L.A. Times, which never misses an
   opportunity to blame something bad on 'climate change', noted that
there are
   currently more than 150 million dead trees in the Sierra Nevada, just
 waiting
   to be ignited. That's how nature manages a forest and if we don't want
half
   the state on fire, we have to do something other than nature's way.
  
   That's why we started the Forest Service to begin with-- to scientifically
   manage the forests so that they're both preserved for people's use and to
 keep
   them healthy and reduce fires to a minimum. And we had healthy forests for
   decades. But then the enviro-kooks came along and said "You're interfering
   with nature! Stop it!" and got all sorts of laws passed requiring a
 hands-off
   approach to forestry and now here we are, with the entire West Coast
   frequently ablaze.
  
   The Native American tribes understood this and would routinely both clear
 away
   dead trees and brush from around their settlements and villages and
conduct
   controlled burns to reduce the possibility of large out-of-control fires.
 Then
   came the white environmentalists, who dismissed the practices of those
they
   considered ignorant savages, and decided they knew better how to do
things.
   Well, we're seeing how well that worked out, huh?
  
   But no, we're still having to deal with idiots like Pelosi, Newsom,
   Occasional-Cortex, and Karen Bass who insist that this problem can be
solved
   with carbon caps and solar panels and windmills, when the truth is that if
 the
   U.S. literally shut down all emissions COMPLETELY-- cars, gone; industry,
   gone; cattle farming, gone; airplanes, gone; all of it, gone-- and we
lived
   that way for the next 80 years, it would only reduce the global mean
   temperature by 0.3 degrees. That's from the U.N. IPCC model itself. You
can
 go
   run the numbers yourself if you don't believe it.
  
   These wildfires are not a 'climate change' problem. They're a forest
   management problem. Period.

 
 You talk a big game, but I'm quoting NOAA.
 

   NEWS & EVENTS
   Study Finds Climate Change to Blame For Record-Breaking California
Wildfires
   Published onAugust 8, 2023

 

   In a new NIDIS-funded study in Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences,
 an international group of researchers created a climate-driven model of
 summer burned area evolution in California and combined it with natural and
 historical climate simulations to assess the importance of human-caused
 climate change on increased burned areas.
  
   It was found that nearly all the observed increase in burned areas over
the
 past half-century is due to human-caused climate change. It is estimated
 that from 1971 to 2021, human-caused climate change contributed to a +172%
 increase in burned areas, with a  +320% increase from 1996 to 2021. In the
 coming decades, a further increase in annual forest burned areas is
 expected, ranging from 3% to 52%.

 
 You are so full of shit, it ain't even funny anymore.

 
 "...the extent to which burned area changes are due to natural variability
or
 human-caused climate change has remained largely unresolved."
 
 Even your own cite declines to lay the blame for the fires on the 'climate
 change' bogeyman.
 
 They then go on to describe a study that just assumes increases in fires =
 'climate change'. No other variables were accounted for, like the billions
of
 board-feet of dry deadwood lying on forest floors all around the state just
 waiting to be ignited because leftist environmental policies prohibit
clearing
 it out.
 

How fucking ignorant ARE you?

I'm not the one who thinks a chaotic system should never change or that if we
only paid more taxes, it would stop changing.

"Earth marks 12 straight months of record heat, a bewildering climate
change milestone."

And yet there have been demonstrably warmer years in earth's history. Hell,
there have been warmer centuries in earth's history, so all these 'records'
they claim are being broken is just religious propaganda from the Climate
Cult.