Liste des Groupes | Revenir à ra tv |
On Jun 10, 2024 at 4:21:06 AM PDT, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 6/8/24 9:48 PM, BTR1701 wrote:<fredp1571@gmail.com>On Jun 7, 2024 at 5:51:24 AM PDT, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
On 6/4/24 5:09 PM, BTR1701 wrote:On Jun 4, 2024 at 8:25:10 AM PDT, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
On 6/3/24 10:35 PM, BTR1701 wrote:In article <v3llcv$3kpo$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
On 6/3/24 2:22 PM, BTR1701 wrote:In article <v3kipd$3u0gd$5@dont-email.me>, FPPgovernor becausewrote:
On 6/2/24 10:05 PM, BTR1701 wrote:FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:On 6/2/24 3:26 PM, BTR1701 wrote:So when you said you don't talk about another state'sit... a lie.he doesn't affect your life... that was... wait forcountry is
How does eating out affect my life?
Now, trying to destroy capitalism and education in thethe entireanother matter.
Your own words: another state's governor doesn't affect my life.
Weird how you're now claiming some governors have the power to
do exactly
that by "destroying capitalism and education" throughoutrespective states. Howcountry by signing laws that only apply to theirapplies to Floridadoes DeSantis signing an education bill that onlyEffa the Hutt,affect your life, Effa?
Still no answer here.
But for some reason when Newsom signs laws, according tohis bullshit. Likehe only has the power to affect California, despite the fact
that in many
cases, he actually does affect the whole country withaffects the wholewhen he banned all gas-powered vehicles by 2035. Thatthe car market,country because California is such a large percentage ofCalifornia standardsvehicle manufacturers conform their products toa twist: heregardless of where they'll eventually be sold.Newsom went out to eat.
Newsom did exactly what Cruz did that gets your panties init twice.went on vacation while his state was in crisis. And he didOnce he gotCruz only did it once.
DeSantis is destroying a state.
Not your state. Doesn't affect your life. Your words.Nope. False equivalence.
Newsom owned up to it.
Newsom never 'owned up' to fleeing the state for vacation.Laundry wascaught, he admitted his maskless indoor dining at the Frenchin Cabo whilewrong. But he never gave a mea culpa for being on vacationchange' ishe his state was on fire.You guys caused the fires, ignoring climate change.
To quote our newest Hutt: Nope.
This nonsense that the California wildfires are due to 'climatebad forestridiculous. Even Emperor Newsom has admitted that historicallymillion acresmanagement at both the federal and state level is a major factor in the
severity and frequency of the most recent wildfires.
Anyone who thinks that if we'd all just installed more solar panels and
rode
our bikes to work, that the state wouldn't be on fire every year is
completely
delusional. And these idiotic media reporters and politicians who keep
saying
that the amount of acreage burned in California in 2019-- the worst fire
year
(2.2 million acres)-- is 'record-breaking' and 'unprecedented' are
bald-faced
liars. It's fucking factually completely untrue.
Before the 1800s, California would see anywhere from 5 to 14Before thereburn EVERY YEAR. That's 12% of the state burning every year.and federalwere
any SUVs or 'climate change'. Just as there were massive droughts in
California long before the era of 'climate change'. California had a
500-year
drought between 800 and 1300 AD. These are documented scientific facts,
but
that undermines the Agenda, so we get flat-out lies from politicians
claiming
this is unprecedented, which goes completely unchallenged by their media
lackeys.
Excess timber comes out of a forest in only one of two ways. It's either
carried out or it burns up. We used to carry it out. It was called
logging.
We
had healthy forests and a thriving timber economy. Then in the 70s, we
began
imposing a shit-ton of environmental laws-- both at the statethat samelevel-- that have made it all but impossible and wildly unprofitable to
carry
out that timber and what we've seen over those decades is increasingly
severe
forest fires.
We've had an 80% decline in timber harvested out of California forests
since
1980 and we've had 85% increase in acres destroyed by fire overthese laws andperiod. The mismanagement has gotten to the point where you can tell the
boundary between private forestland that is not affected byoff, and thatthe
public lands that are. The burn scars follow the property lines almost
exactly
in many cases.
Wow, the climate sure is clever to only change over the public lands and
burn
them while leaving the private lands alone, isn't it?
An untended forest will grow and grow until it chokes itself off. When
there
are too many trees for the land to support, they start dyingwaiting to bedead timber becomes thousands of square miles of fuel, justscientificallyset
ablaze. California currently has four times the timber density that the
land
can support. Even the reliably leftist L.A. Times, which never misses an
opportunity to blame something bad on 'climate change', noted that
there are
currently more than 150 million dead trees in the Sierra Nevada, just
waiting
to be ignited. That's how nature manages a forest and if we don't want
half
the state on fire, we have to do something other than nature's way.
That's why we started the Forest Service to begin with-- touse and tomanage the forests so that they're both preserved for people'sforests forkeep
them healthy and reduce fires to a minimum. And we had healthyinterferingdecades. But then the enviro-kooks came along and said "You'reboth clearwith nature! Stop it!" and got all sorts of laws passed requiring a
hands-off
approach to forestry and now here we are, with the entire West Coast
frequently ablaze.
The Native American tribes understood this and would routinelyout-of-control fires.away
dead trees and brush from around their settlements and villages and
conduct
controlled burns to reduce the possibility of largeis that ifThen
came the white environmentalists, who dismissed the practices of those
they
considered ignorant savages, and decided they knew better how to do
things.
Well, we're seeing how well that worked out, huh?
But no, we're still having to deal with idiots like Pelosi, Newsom,
Occasional-Cortex, and Karen Bass who insist that this problem can be
solved
with carbon caps and solar panels and windmills, when the truthindustry,the
U.S. literally shut down all emissions COMPLETELY-- cars, gone;Sciences,gone; cattle farming, gone; airplanes, gone; all of it, gone-- and we
lived
that way for the next 80 years, it would only reduce the global mean
temperature by 0.3 degrees. That's from the U.N. IPCC model itself. You
can
go
run the numbers yourself if you don't believe it.
These wildfires are not a 'climate change' problem. They're a forest
management problem. Period.
You talk a big game, but I'm quoting NOAA.
NEWS & EVENTS
Study Finds Climate Change to Blame For Record-Breaking California
Wildfires
Published onAugust 8, 2023In a new NIDIS-funded study in Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetarynatural andan international group of researchers created a climate-driven model of
summer burned area evolution in California and combined it with>How fucking ignorant ARE you?historical climate simulations to assess the importance of human-caused
climate change on increased burned areas.
It was found that nearly all the observed increase in burned areas over
the
past half-century is due to human-caused climate change. It is estimated
that from 1971 to 2021, human-caused climate change contributed to a +172%
increase in burned areas, with a +320% increase from 1996 to 2021. In the
coming decades, a further increase in annual forest burned areas is
expected, ranging from 3% to 52%.
You are so full of shit, it ain't even funny anymore.
"...the extent to which burned area changes are due to natural variability
or
human-caused climate change has remained largely unresolved."
Even your own cite declines to lay the blame for the fires on the 'climate
change' bogeyman.
They then go on to describe a study that just assumes increases in fires =
'climate change'. No other variables were accounted for, like the billions
of
board-feet of dry deadwood lying on forest floors all around the state just
waiting to be ignited because leftist environmental policies prohibit
clearing
it out.
I'm not the one who thinks a chaotic system should never change or that if we
only paid more taxes, it would stop changing.
>"Earth marks 12 straight months of record heat, a bewildering climate>
change milestone."
And yet there have been demonstrably warmer years in earth's history. Hell,
there have been warmer centuries in earth's history, so all these 'records'
they claim are being broken is just religious propaganda from the Climate
Cult.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.