Ubishit (was: What Did You Watch? 2024-06-10 (Monday))

Ian J. Ball <ijball@mac.invalid> wrote:

On 6/11/24 8:31 AM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:

Dimensional Traveler <dtravel@sonic.net> wrote:

On 6/11/2024 6:26 AM, anim8rfsk wrote:

Reposted for all those who can't see the original

Why?  Some of us don't WANT to see the original.

Ubi posted through eternal-september.org and the post appeared on
eternal-september.org. His posts do not require resurrection as they
aren't missing in the first place.

His earlier posts from, I think, GigiNews were not showing up on ES. So
whatever campaign you're waging against him is having some effect...

I'm not "waging whatever campaign against him". I'm just reacting when
I happen to spot something. It's not my place to tell other Usenet
posters never to post followups to Ubi, even when he's not plagarizing
and not forging other Usenet posters. I won't tolerate Ubi under any
circumstances. Others do. Their choice.

Ubi the shithead's forgeries are all nonstandard in addition as he
copies headers added at injection at the genuine server to repost through
Giganews. He gets away with it because the News server used by Giganews
is old and does not enforce these standards.

Ubi commits abuse OF Usenet in violation of Giganews AUP but Giganews
refuses to TOS him. Ubi has forged a hell of a lot of Usenet posters over
several decades, but this is hardly the only abuse he commits.

Ray issued a couple of unauthenticated cancels against Ubishit because Ubi
compromised one of Ray's domains in copying headers added at injection.
No one maintaining a News server according to best practices acts upon
unauthenticated cancels these days. Ray knows this and said he didn't
want to issue any more, so someone else issued a NoCeM.

This is a real problem. Antics of Ubi the shithead were not anticipated
when authenticated cancels were devised. It doesn't matter if they were,
for Ubi the shithead would have found some other way to commit abuse OF
Usenet that's difficult to enforce against.

I didn't look to see why two of Ubi's articles posted through
eternal-september were missing on eternal-september, whether NoCeM
issuance or just a glitch. If Ubi wants to know, the NoCeMs are logged
publicly.

. . .