Re: Cruz Destroys Gender Activist Judge During Hearing

On 6/11/24 4:57 AM, trotsky wrote:

On 6/10/24 12:13 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

On Jun 10, 2024 at 4:21:06 AM PDT, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>

On 6/8/24 9:48 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

  On Jun 7, 2024 at 5:51:24 AM PDT, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:

  On 6/4/24 5:09 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

    On Jun 4, 2024 at 8:25:10 AM PDT, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:

    On 6/3/24 10:35 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

      In article <v3llcv$3kpo$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
      wrote:

      On 6/3/24 2:22 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

      In article <v3kipd$3u0gd$5@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
      wrote:
>

      On 6/2/24 10:05 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

      FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:

      On 6/2/24 3:26 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

      So when you said you don't talk about another state's governor because
      he doesn't affect your life... that was... wait for it... a lie.

>
      How does eating out affect my life?
>
      Now, trying to destroy capitalism and education in the country is
      another matter.

>
      Your own words: another state's governor doesn't affect my life.
>
      Weird how you're now claiming some governors have the power to
do exactly
      that by "destroying capitalism and education" throughout the entire
      country by signing laws that only apply to their respective states. How
      does DeSantis signing an education bill that only applies to Florida
      affect your life, Effa?

      Still no answer here.

      But for some reason when Newsom signs laws, according to Effa the Hutt,
      he only has the power to affect California, despite the fact
that in many
      cases, he actually does affect the whole country with his bullshit. Like
      when he banned all gas-powered vehicles by 2035. That affects the whole
      country because California is such a large percentage of the car market,
      vehicle manufacturers conform their products to California standards
      regardless of where they'll eventually be sold.

>

      Newsom went out to eat.

>
      Newsom did exactly what Cruz did that gets your panties in a twist: he
      went on vacation while his state was in crisis. And he did it twice.
      Cruz only did it once.
>

      DeSantis is destroying a state.

>
      Not your state. Doesn't affect your life. Your words.

      Nope. False equivalence.
>
      Newsom owned up to it.

      Newsom never 'owned up' to fleeing the state for vacation. Once he got
      caught, he admitted his maskless indoor dining at the French Laundry was
      wrong. But he never gave a mea culpa for being on vacation in Cabo while
      he his state was on fire.

    You guys caused the fires, ignoring climate change.

    To quote our newest Hutt: Nope.
    This nonsense that the California wildfires are due to 'climate change' is
    ridiculous. Even Emperor Newsom has admitted that historically bad forest
    management at both the federal and state level is a major factor in the
    severity and frequency of the most recent wildfires.
    Anyone who thinks that if we'd all just installed more solar panels and
rode
    our bikes to work, that the state wouldn't be on fire every year is
  completely
    delusional. And these idiotic media reporters and politicians who keep
  saying
    that the amount of acreage burned in California in 2019-- the worst fire
  year
    (2.2 million acres)-- is 'record-breaking' and 'unprecedented' are
  bald-faced
    liars. It's fucking factually completely untrue.
    Before the 1800s, California would see anywhere from 5 to 14 million acres
    burn EVERY YEAR. That's 12% of the state burning every year. Before there
  were
    any SUVs or 'climate change'. Just as there were massive droughts in
    California long before the era of 'climate change'. California had a
  500-year
    drought between 800 and 1300 AD. These are documented scientific facts,
but
    that undermines the Agenda, so we get flat-out lies from politicians
  claiming
    this is unprecedented, which goes completely unchallenged by their media
    lackeys.
    Excess timber comes out of a forest in only one of two ways. It's either
    carried out or it burns up. We used to carry it out. It was called
logging.
  We
    had healthy forests and a thriving timber economy. Then in the 70s, we
began
    imposing a shit-ton of environmental laws-- both at the state and federal
    level-- that have made it all but impossible and wildly unprofitable to
  carry
    out that timber and what we've seen over those decades is increasingly
  severe
    forest fires.
    We've had an 80% decline in timber harvested out of California forests
since
    1980 and we've had 85% increase in acres destroyed by fire over that same
    period. The mismanagement has gotten to the point where you can tell the
    boundary between private forestland that is not affected by these laws and
  the
    public lands that are. The burn scars follow the property lines almost
  exactly
    in many cases.
    Wow, the climate sure is clever to only change over the public lands and
  burn
    them while leaving the private lands alone, isn't it?
    An untended forest will grow and grow until it chokes itself off. When
there
    are too many trees for the land to support, they start dying off, and that
    dead timber becomes thousands of square miles of fuel, just waiting to be
  set
    ablaze. California currently has four times the timber density that the
land
    can support. Even the reliably leftist L.A. Times, which never misses an
    opportunity to blame something bad on 'climate change', noted that
there are
    currently more than 150 million dead trees in the Sierra Nevada, just
  waiting
    to be ignited. That's how nature manages a forest and if we don't want
half
    the state on fire, we have to do something other than nature's way.
    That's why we started the Forest Service to begin with-- to scientifically
    manage the forests so that they're both preserved for people's use and to
  keep
    them healthy and reduce fires to a minimum. And we had healthy forests for
    decades. But then the enviro-kooks came along and said "You're interfering
    with nature! Stop it!" and got all sorts of laws passed requiring a
  hands-off
    approach to forestry and now here we are, with the entire West Coast
    frequently ablaze.
    The Native American tribes understood this and would routinely both clear
  away
    dead trees and brush from around their settlements and villages and
conduct
    controlled burns to reduce the possibility of large out-of-control fires.
  Then
    came the white environmentalists, who dismissed the practices of those
they
    considered ignorant savages, and decided they knew better how to do
things.
    Well, we're seeing how well that worked out, huh?
    But no, we're still having to deal with idiots like Pelosi, Newsom,
    Occasional-Cortex, and Karen Bass who insist that this problem can be
solved
    with carbon caps and solar panels and windmills, when the truth is that if
  the
    U.S. literally shut down all emissions COMPLETELY-- cars, gone; industry,
    gone; cattle farming, gone; airplanes, gone; all of it, gone-- and we
lived
    that way for the next 80 years, it would only reduce the global mean
    temperature by 0.3 degrees. That's from the U.N. IPCC model itself. You
can
  go
    run the numbers yourself if you don't believe it.
    These wildfires are not a 'climate change' problem. They're a forest
    management problem. Period.

>
  You talk a big game, but I'm quoting NOAA.
>

    NEWS & EVENTS
    Study Finds Climate Change to Blame For Record-Breaking California
Wildfires
    Published onAugust 8, 2023

>

    In a new NIDIS-funded study in Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences,
  an international group of researchers created a climate-driven model of
  summer burned area evolution in California and combined it with natural and
  historical climate simulations to assess the importance of human-caused
  climate change on increased burned areas.
    It was found that nearly all the observed increase in burned areas over
the
  past half-century is due to human-caused climate change. It is estimated
  that from 1971 to 2021, human-caused climate change contributed to a +172%
  increase in burned areas, with a  +320% increase from 1996 to 2021. In the
  coming decades, a further increase in annual forest burned areas is
  expected, ranging from 3% to 52%.

>
  You are so full of shit, it ain't even funny anymore.

  "...the extent to which burned area changes are due to natural variability
or
  human-caused climate change has remained largely unresolved."
  Even your own cite declines to lay the blame for the fires on the 'climate
  change' bogeyman.
  They then go on to describe a study that just assumes increases in fires =
  'climate change'. No other variables were accounted for, like the billions
of
  board-feet of dry deadwood lying on forest floors all around the state just
  waiting to be ignited because leftist environmental policies prohibit
clearing
  it out.

How fucking ignorant ARE you?

>
I'm not the one who thinks a chaotic system should never change or that if we
only paid more taxes, it would stop changing.

  You were close, billionaires need to pay more taxes.
 

"Earth marks 12 straight months of record heat, a bewildering climate
change milestone."

>
And yet there have been demonstrably warmer years in earth's history. Hell,
there have been warmer centuries in earth's history, so all these 'records'
they claim are being broken is just religious propaganda from the Climate
Cult.
>
>

 

He thinks because it was hotter 56 million years ago, we have nothing to worry about.
Just forget about the millions who will starve and die and lead to the death of civilization as we know it.
Thanny doesn't care.
--
On May 30, 2024 Donald J. Trump was unanimously convicted on 34 felony counts in New York City... so I took this picture in my side yard.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC Bible  25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0