Liste des Groupes | Revenir à ra tv |
In article <v4rvqd$1brlu$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>I guess if it wasn't for being a gay asshole you wouldn't have any personality at all. I'm reminded of the movie The Last Boy Scout: "Why did Oath Keeper Twat cross the road? Because his dick was stuck in a chicken."
wrote:
On 6/10/24 1:09 PM, BTR1701 wrote:On Jun 10, 2024 at 4:17:21 AM PDT, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 6/8/24 2:08 PM, BTR1701 wrote:>In article <v41t67$2lmr3$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>Not at all.
wrote:
On 6/7/24 3:18 PM, BTR1701 wrote:Irrelevant. You claimed I did comment, so Mr. I-Never-Post-Something-In article <v3uven$22nu4$4@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>>
wrote:
>On 6/4/24 5:28 PM, BTR1701 wrote:>On Jun 4, 2024 at 8:35:23 AM PDT, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
>On 6/3/24 10:43 PM, BTR1701 wrote:In article <v3lkv6$3jgk$1@dont-email.me>, FPP
<fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
On 6/3/24 1:06 PM, shawn wrote:>>Sorry shawn... I had my bedtime eye ointment in, and must haveFYI- You're responding to Shawn-- who's generally sympathetic toThey don't really need any ankle bracelets since he's got theWho says? You?
Secret Service protection. Plus he's not likely to skip the
country. Most likely he would get home confinement to
Mar-A-Largo which isn't really home confinement. Other than
his inability to travel to do rallys. It's not like being
confined to a 2 bedroom home.
>
>
Why aren't ankle bracelets needed? Is he special? Does the
convict get to choose his jailers now?
>
Why Mar-a-Lago? Why not Trump Tower? He committed the crime in
New York. He was indicted and convicted in New York. Why
shouldn't he serve his sentence in (wait for it) New York?
>
Who gets to pick? The convict? Is this what your legal instincts
tell you? Or are you just bullshitting in favor or your Dear
Leader again?
Dems and on your side-- not me, you dumb fucktard. Look at the
attributions from now on before going full froth.
missed the attribution.
>
Strike the last paragraph. The others are still relevant, though.
>
Thanny: "Is this what your legal instincts tell you?
Or are you just bullshitting in favor or your Dear Leader again?"
>
That's for YOU.
Up to this point, I haven't commented on Trump's method of punishment
AT ALL, so other than directly out of your ass, I have no idea where
you're getting the "Or are you just bullshitting in favor or your
Dear Leader again?" and assigning it to me.You almost never comment on Dear Leader, do you?>
Nice attempt at deflection but no one's falling for it.
>
Since I never commented on Trump's method of punishment AT ALL, where
are you getting "Or are you just bullshitting in favor or your Dear
Leader again?", other than out of your ass?
>
Remember, you've specifically directed that question to me now, so
you can't pawn it off as a mistake or because your herpes eye unguent
confused you.
And you think NOT commenting on a convicted felon and adjudicated
rapist and fraud says something good about you?
Without-Proof has painted himself into a corner yet again.
So post the proof. Show me where I commented on Trump's potential
sentencing details. Betcha won't because you can't.You never mention Trump. That's the point.And yet you claimed I did comment on Trump.
So that would be... wait for it... a lie.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.