Re: Kamala Outright Lies About Women's Basketball Brackets

In article <v52jb5$2qnl3$3@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:

On 6/18/24 4:42 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

In article <v4rvqd$1brlu$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
 

On 6/10/24 1:09 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

On Jun 10, 2024 at 4:17:21 AM PDT, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>

On 6/8/24 2:08 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

In article <v41t67$2lmr3$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
  

On 6/7/24 3:18 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

In article <v3uven$22nu4$4@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
>

On 6/4/24 5:28 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

On Jun 4, 2024 at 8:35:23 AM PDT, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
>

On 6/3/24 10:43 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

In article <v3lkv6$3jgk$1@dont-email.me>, FPP
<fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
      

On 6/3/24 1:06 PM, shawn wrote:

>

They don't really need any ankle bracelets since he's got the
Secret Service protection. Plus he's not likely to skip the
country. Most likely he would get home confinement to
Mar-A-Largo which isn't really home confinement. Other than
his inability to travel to do rallys. It's not like being
confined to a 2 bedroom home.
>

Who says? You?
>
Why aren't ankle bracelets needed? Is he special? Does the
convict get to choose his jailers now?
>
Why Mar-a-Lago? Why not Trump Tower? He committed the crime in
New York. He was indicted and convicted in New York. Why
shouldn't he serve his sentence in (wait for it) New York?
>
Who gets to pick? The convict? Is this what your legal instincts
tell you? Or are you just bullshitting in favor or your Dear
Leader again?

      
FYI- You're responding to Shawn-- who's generally sympathetic to
Dems and on your side-- not me, you dumb fucktard. Look at the
attributions from now on before going full froth.
      

Sorry shawn... I had my bedtime eye ointment in, and must have
missed the attribution.
>
Strike the last paragraph. The others are still relevant, though.
>
Thanny: "Is this what your legal instincts tell you?
Or are you just bullshitting in favor or your Dear Leader again?"
>
That's for YOU.

>
Up to this point, I haven't commented on Trump's method of
punishment AT ALL, so other than directly out of your ass, I
have no idea where you're getting the "Or are you just
bullshitting in favor or your Dear Leader again?" and assigning
it to me.

>

You almost never comment on Dear Leader, do you?

>
Nice attempt at deflection but no one's falling for it.
>
Since I never commented on Trump's method of punishment AT ALL, where
are you getting "Or are you just bullshitting in favor or your Dear
Leader again?", other than out of your ass?
>
Remember, you've specifically directed that question to me now, so
you can't pawn it off as a mistake or because your herpes eye unguent
confused you.

>
And you think NOT commenting on a convicted felon and adjudicated
rapist and fraud says something good about you?

  
Irrelevant. You claimed I did comment, so Mr. I-Never-Post-Something-
Without-Proof has painted himself into a corner yet again.
  

Not at all.

>
So post the proof. Show me where I commented on Trump's potential
sentencing details. Betcha won't because you can't.

 

You never mention Trump. That's the point.

 
And yet you claimed I did comment on Trump.
 
So that would be... wait for it... a lie.
 

Got me there, klown!  I'm done for now...

At least you admitted it. Of course that also makes all the other times
you said you never  lie a... wait for it... also a lie.

 

"Always" and "Never" statements are frequently used by people when they
are arguing in order to emphasize or illustrate the merits of their
position.

Oh, so now colloquialisms are okay again? Weird how we're never allowed
to stray from the literal unless it's necessary to get Effa out of a jam.

Of course even granting hyperbole for the sake of an Effa win on Usenet
today, that *still* doesn't get you out of this jam:

"Or are you just bullshitting in favor or your Dear Leader again?"

In which you reference alleged statements on Trump's sentencing that I
never made. No amount of pretend appeals to hyperbole are gonna get you
out of this lie, Effa.