Re: 5th Circuit Strikes Down Bump Stock Ban

In article <v52jlr$2qnl3$7@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:

On 6/18/24 9:43 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

In article <v4t1dt$1ig6v$1@dont-email.me>,
  moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
 

On 6/18/2024 5:00 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

In article <v4s1q2$1c3jr$7@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
>

Maybe if we all chipped in a few bucks, Clarenzabell and Sammy Flagflyer
would change their votes.

>
Weird how Alito's flag also has flown over San Francisco's city hall for
more than half a century. Hardly a bastion of conservatism, San
Francisco. Yet when SF prog pols fly it, it's no big deal.
>
https://ibb.co/S6wFxDy
>
It was also used prominently by BLM during their 'mostly peaceful'
Summer of Love.
>
https://ibb.co/Z8kvvMc
>
So to recap: a flag when flown by leftist pols and far-left violent
communist protest groups is totes cool, but the moment a conservative
raises it on his private property, he should be impeached and removed
from office.

>
Yes, we hold a Supreme Court Justice to a stricter standard of
impartiality than we do an organization like BLM.  Life's unfair...

 
Government officials are government officials. If it's not a problem for
the ones in San Francisco to fly it, it's not a problem for any official
to fly it.
 

Do they still fly it? And if not, why not?

I have no idea. I haven't been to San Francisco in several years. But
they flew it for 60 years. If it was the appalling affront to democracy,
apple pie, and tiny, tiny babies that you act like it is, why were the
good little progs of San Francisco flying it over the sacred halls of
government there for more than a half a century?