Liste des Groupes | Revenir à ra tv |
On 6/19/24 9:10 PM, shawn wrote:On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 16:28:26 -0700, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
In article <v4vh5f$258cf$2@dont-email.me>,
moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
Both still require the same action. A single trigger pull, withMachine gun:>
>
"...any weapon which shoots, is designed to shoot, or can be readily
restored to shoot, automatically more than one shot, without manual
reloading, by a single function of the trigger."
>
Now, tell me again how either gun in my video doesn't qualify...
Because with the bump stock, it's only firing one shot per pull of the
trigger. The trigger is just being pulled repeatedly really fast as a
result of rebounding recoil caused by the bump stock. The bumper rocks
the rifle back and forth against the shooter's trigger finger, causing a
separate trigger pull each time. The statute you quoted above clearly
says "by a SINGLE function of the trigger". If you shoot 100 rounds with
a bump stock, you've got 100 functions of the trigger, not a single
function of the trigger.
Yes, you are definitely technically correct. (The best kind.) That
said you can see why people consider the bump stock to be the
equivalent of turning a weapon into an equal to a machine gun. It
isn't a machine gun but it ends throwing lead down field much like
one. I think eventually the law will be updated to include bump stocks
but who knows how long that will take. As no one who was involved in
writing the original act likely foresaw the possibility of a bump
stock.
constant pressure.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.