Liste des Groupes | Revenir à ra tv |
In article <v52l6l$2qv7o$9@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>Then why plead it out and surrender your guns? They weren't exonerated, or acquitted, they were pardoned.
wrote:
On 6/19/24 12:27 PM, BTR1701 wrote:Apparently it does mean that.In article <v4uvta$21spc$2@dont-email.me>,Sure... and the trespassers were cited for it. Still doesn't mean you
moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>On 6/18/2024 9:41 PM, BTR1701 wrote:>In article <v4t2ai$1imbc$1@dont-email.me>,>
"Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>BTR1701 <no_email@invalid.invalid> wrote:>
>ST. LOUIS (AP) - A judge has expunged the misdemeanor convictions>
of a St. Louis couple who waved guns at racial injustice protesters
outside their mansion in 2020. Now they want their guns back.
I had no idea that four years later, this still hadn't happened.
>
It was a gated community, which are all over St. Louis. They were
trespassing.
Apparently 'trespassing' is a meaningless term when you're doing it for
'social justice'.
Don't you even *pretend* there's a built-in tug-of-war between
"trespassing" and "peaceable assembly"?
Maybe in a public place like a university quad, but not in a private
residential neighborhood.
>
can brandish a weapon at peaceful protestors you're scared of.
McCloskey appealed, saying the pardon restored all forfeited rights of citizenship and removed all legal disadvantage. But a unanimous Court of Appeals said the scope of the pardon ends at the obliteration of the conviction. “The law recognizes the difference between a conviction and guilt.Jesus, I thought you said you studied law?
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.