Re: Criminal Records Expunged for St. Louis Gun Couple

In article <v52nob$2va97$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:

On 6/20/24 9:35 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

In article <v52l6l$2qv7o$9@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
 

On 6/19/24 12:27 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

In article <v4uvta$21spc$2@dont-email.me>,
   moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>

On 6/18/2024 9:41 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

In article <v4t2ai$1imbc$1@dont-email.me>,
    "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>

BTR1701 <no_email@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>

ST. LOUIS (AP) - A judge has expunged the misdemeanor convictions
of a St. Louis couple who waved guns at racial injustice protesters
outside their mansion in 2020. Now they want their guns back.

>
I had no idea that four years later, this still hadn't happened.
>
It was a gated community, which are all over St. Louis. They were
trespassing.

>
Apparently 'trespassing' is a meaningless term when you're doing it for
'social justice'.

>
Don't you even *pretend* there's a built-in tug-of-war between
"trespassing" and "peaceable assembly"?

>
Maybe in a public place like a university quad, but not in a private
residential neighborhood.
>

Sure... and the trespassers were cited for it. Still doesn't mean you
can brandish a weapon at peaceful protestors you're scared of.

 
Apparently it does mean that.
 

 
Then why plead it out and surrender your guns?

You think they're the first innocent people in American history to plead
to a lesser charge in the face of a politically motivated prosecution?