Re: Criminal Records Expunged for St. Louis Gun Couple

In article <v5i28t$2b8qj$3@dont-email.me>,
 moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

On 6/26/2024 5:04 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

In article <v5huvd$2aohk$1@dont-email.me>,
  moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
 

On 6/25/2024 11:13 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

In article <v5fvh9$1uphg$4@dont-email.me>,
   moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

In the circumstances you yourself paint, there's obviously no such
thing as "*JUST* holding a gun".

>

Were the rooftop Koreans during the Rodney King riots criminals?

>
I don't remember what you're talking about ...but possibly they were
threatening deadly force.

>
Google it.
>
Theirs were among the only stores in those neighborhoods not looted
and/or burned, so apparently whatever they were threatening, it was
justified.

>
Many obscenely wrong measures can be effective without being justified.

 
So they should have just let their property and livelihoods be destroyed
to protect the poor wittle rioters from feeling skeered?
 
What exactly is "obscenely wrong" about arming yourself in the middle of
a violent riot and defending yourself and your property?
 
Why are you always on the side of the shitbags of this world?

 
I'm not on anyone's "side"

And yet your objections always seem to favor the side of the shitbag.
Like here, where you call perfectly reasonable and morally justifiable
actions of self-defense "obscenely wrong".