Liste des Groupes | Revenir à ra tv |
On 6/28/2024 12:07 PM, BTR1701 wrote:In article <v5mjv0$3cvu7$3@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
On 6/22/24 11:52 AM, BTR1701 wrote:FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:On 6/22/24 11:30 AM, BTR1701 wrote:FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:Then why hasn't anyone said that, besides you?They decide law based on intent all the time. It's a staple of the
system.
Cool! Let's go with intent, then. Which means all those millions of
illegals pretending to be refugees and just reciting the magic words to
game the system can be summarily denied and deported because the intent
of the refugee law was never to allow millions of people who don't
qualify as refugees to game and overwhelm the system and flood
unchecked into the country.
Regardless of what the law actually says, its intent was never to
create the current border crisis we're currently experiencing, so we
can ignore what's written and just go with intent.
I'm really starting to warm up to The Law According to Effa!
What do you think the Supreme Court uses to judge whether a law is
constitutional?
Umm... the Constitution.
Ummm... pass the border bill your side wrote.
No need. We already have the intent of the Immigration and Naturalization
Act!
Because deciding cases based on intent isn't really a thing. Something I
was trying to illustrate with sarcasm.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Letter_and_spirit_of_the_law
Gosh, it *seems* to really be a thing...
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.