Liste des Groupes | Revenir à ra tv |
On Jun 28, 2024 at 9:33:45 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:But, back on the subject, it appears that intent *can* inform decisions.
On 6/28/2024 12:07 PM, BTR1701 wrote:Gosh, then we're back to not needing to care about what the text of theIn article <v5mjv0$3cvu7$3@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>>
wrote:
On 6/22/24 11:52 AM, BTR1701 wrote:FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:On 6/22/24 11:30 AM, BTR1701 wrote:FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:Because deciding cases based on intent isn't really a thing. Something IThen why hasn't anyone said that, besides you?>>They decide law based on intent all the time. It's a staple of the>
system.
Cool! Let's go with intent, then. Which means all those millions of
illegals pretending to be refugees and just reciting the magic words to
game the system can be summarily denied and deported because the intent
of the refugee law was never to allow millions of people who don't
qualify as refugees to game and overwhelm the system and flood
unchecked into the country.
>
Regardless of what the law actually says, its intent was never to
create the current border crisis we're currently experiencing, so we
can ignore what's written and just go with intent.
>
I'm really starting to warm up to The Law According to Effa!
>What do you think the Supreme Court uses to judge whether a law is>
constitutional?
Umm... the Constitution.
Ummm... pass the border bill your side wrote.
No need. We already have the intent of the Immigration and Naturalization
Act!
>
was trying to illustrate with sarcasm.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Letter_and_spirit_of_the_law
>
Gosh, it *seems* to really be a thing...
Immigration and Naturalization Act says, since it was unquestionably NOT the
intent of those who wrote it to erase the southern border allow the entire
Southern Hemisphere to flood into the country.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.