Liste des Groupes | Revenir à ra tv |
In article <v5mkat$3cvu7$9@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>Congratulations are in order, I was pretty sure you didn't have the balls to ever mention the name "Trump" again.
wrote:
On 6/22/24 11:46 AM, BTR1701 wrote:Don't need to because this statement by you didn't use a figure ofFPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:Not explaining figures of speech to you again.On 6/20/24 10:20 PM, BTR1701 wrote:>In article <v52mim$2usni$11@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>And you never will.
wrote:
>On 6/20/24 9:16 PM, BTR1701 wrote:>In article <v52jb5$2qnl3$3@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
>On 6/18/24 4:42 PM, BTR1701 wrote:In article <v4rvqd$1brlu$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:>Always were. We all use them every day.>Got me there, klown! I'm done for now...>>Not at all.And you think NOT commenting on a convicted felon and>
adjudicated
rapist and fraud says something good about you?
Irrelevant. You claimed I did comment, so Mr.
I-Never-Post-Something-
Without-Proof has painted himself into a corner yet again.
>
So post the proof. Show me where I commented on Trump's potential
sentencing details. Betcha won't because you can't.You never mention Trump. That's the point.>
And yet you claimed I did comment on Trump.
>
So that would be... wait for it... a lie.
>
At least you admitted it. Of course that also makes all the other times
you said you never lie a... wait for it... also a lie.>>"Always" and "Never" statements are frequently used by people when
they
are arguing in order to emphasize or illustrate the merits of their
position.
Oh, so now colloquialisms are okay again? Weird how we're never allowed
to stray from the literal unless it's necessary to get Effa out of a
jam.
>
You just used "never", didn't you, moron? If you were sticking to your
guns you NEVER would use the word never in this context.
>
Only nit-pickers, like you, use them as an excuse.
Stupid much?
Of course even granting hyperbole for the sake of an Effa win on Usenet
today, that *still* doesn't get you out of this jam:
>
"Or are you just bullshitting in favor or your Dear Leader again?"
>
In which you reference alleged statements on Trump's sentencing that I
never made. No amount of pretend appeals to hyperbole are gonna get you
out of this lie, Effa.
>
I never will what? Get you out of your lie? Why would I even try to do
that? I enjoy having your lies on display for all to see.>>
A rapist. And you made excuses for him...
Wait, I thought I never talked about him, that I was, quote, "in a coma for
four years". Now you have me doing the exact opposite-- making excuses is
talking about him, not being in a coma.
>
Lie, lie, lie, lie... if Effa's lying, it must be a day ending in 'y'.
>
speech:
EFFA: "Or are you just bullshitting in favor or your Dear Leader again?"
Where you referenced alleged statements on Trump's sentencing that I
never made. No figures of speech involved there.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.