Liste des Groupes | Revenir à ra tv |
On Jun 20, 2024 at 8:42:01 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:I watched (what I think was) all the action, and didn't see the rapid-finger firing (I think you're) talking about. What's the time mark?
On 6/19/2024 11:25 PM, BTR1701 wrote:How about this guy firing a Ma Deuce, clearly demonstrating the gun only firesIn article <s6077jpsl679hmse4jdbsf9eg38a9pf6qt@4ax.com>,>
shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 16:28:26 -0700, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:I've seen people who can pull a trigger all on their own pretty damn
>In article <v4vh5f$258cf$2@dont-email.me>,>
moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>Machine gun:>
>
"...any weapon which shoots, is designed to shoot, or can be readily
restored to shoot, automatically more than one shot, without manual
reloading, by a single function of the trigger."
>
Now, tell me again how either gun in my video doesn't qualify...
Because with the bump stock, it's only firing one shot per pull of the
trigger. The trigger is just being pulled repeatedly really fast as a
result of rebounding recoil caused by the bump stock. The bumper rocks
the rifle back and forth against the shooter's trigger finger, causing a
separate trigger pull each time. The statute you quoted above clearly
says "by a SINGLE function of the trigger". If you shoot 100 rounds with
a bump stock, you've got 100 functions of the trigger, not a single
function of the trigger.
Yes, you are definitely technically correct. (The best kind.) That
said you can see why people consider the bump stock to be the
equivalent of turning a weapon into an equal to a machine gun. It
isn't a machine gun but it ends throwing lead down field much like
one.
fast-- certainly at a speed that most hoplophobes would consider
"machine gun adjacent".
Should we make it illegal for a human to pull a trigger faster than a
certain rate? Or force anyone who can do it accurately faster than a
certain rate to register their finger with the BATF as a "machine gun"?
I think eventually the law will be updated to include bump stocks
but who knows how long that will take. As no one who was involved in
writing the original act likely foresaw the possibility of a bump
stock.
Did you look at the 15-sec. video I posted? I submit that what you're
seeing for *both* guns is a single function of the trigger *finger* --
i.e., "pull and hold until bodies reach a desired height". If you mean
to say that the bump trigger *vibrates* more noticeably than the auto,
I'd bet that boutique bump-stocks can mitigate that inconvenience...
once for every depression of the trigger. He can just pull the trigger so fast
with nothing but his fingers that you'd think you were watching a machine gun
in action.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6bGSLAVoRhQ&t=134s
Should he have to register his finger as an NFA firearm and obtain a permit to
possess his own finger from BATF?
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.