Liste des Groupes | Revenir à ra tv |
On Oct 20, 2024 at 10:08:29 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:Your examples are legislation. The opposing examples are fatalities.
On 10/20/2024 5:19 AM, The Horny Goat wrote:If we didn't have so many examples of what happens when we allow thatOn Sat, 19 Oct 2024 22:13:21 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>>
wrote:
They're merely your beliefs on what makes citizens safe.I've often wondered why it has not been argued that the 2nd amendment
>
For example, my sister is alive today because she had a gun in her purse
when
she was attacked by a man who intended to murder her. She was much safer
with
a gun than without one.
clause about 'a well ordered militia' hasn't been used to mandate
effective firearm training. After all isn't drill and training
primarily what actual militias DO?
Because 2nd Amendment zealots live in mortal fear of "the thin end of
the wedge", no millimeter may be conceded even to plain common sense.
millimeter, you might have a point.
Long experience has taught us that with the gun-grabbing fundies, there is no
point where they will ever say, "All right, that's enough gun control. We
don't need any more than that."
There's a very determined segment of our government, at all levels, that wants
to do exactly that-- and *will* do exactly that-- given the opportunity, which
accounts for what the anti-gun zealots deride as irrational intransigence
against "common sense" gun control.
Just look what happened in New Orleans in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina
for all the real-world evidence necessary to prove the point.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.