Re: Yet Another Self-Burn from the Harris-Walz Ticket

On Oct 21, 2024 at 2:27:06 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>

On 10/21/2024 3:33 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

 On Oct 21, 2024 at 10:56:51 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
 

 On 10/21/2024 1:36 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

   On Oct 20, 2024 at 10:30:06 PM PDT, "super70s"

<super70s@super70s.invalid>

   wrote:
  

   On 2024-10-20 17:00:19 +0000, BTR1701 said:
 

     "We can't afford four more years of this!" --Tim Walz, Green Bay,
WI rally
    
     Either the dude is literally dunking on his own running mate or
he's come
   over
     to Trump's side and now believes Trump won the 2020 election.

 
   He's obviously talking about 4 more years of Trump.

  
   But Trump isn't in office, so he can't be "this".

 
 Depending on the (missing!) context, of course he can...

 
 No, he can't. He's not in office.

 
But we don't *know* that Walz's "this" isn't referring to, say, Trump's
increasingly manifest dementia.  Hint: 3-second videos reliably lie.
 
 

   Obvious to halfway intelligent and informed people anyway.

  
   Hardly. Kammie has been running as if she's challenging an

incumbent since

 she
   was coronated.

 
 She's running against a known precedent/president.

 
 And yet she and her campaign keep saying she's the "candidate for change".
 Change from what? Who's currently in office? This is the first time in
 American history that an incumbent quixotically keeps beating the drum for
 'change', which would logically imply that she's advocating voters to choose
 her opponent rather than her.

 
She's multi-ethnic, female, and under 60.  Change is guaranteed.

>
Ah, identity politics! Always a great basis on which to cast a vote. Maybe
she's left-handed, too!