Re: [OT] What's next for Kamala Harris?

nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com wrote:

Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:

For the record, I feel strongly that she did NOT lose because of her
gender and skin colour: not by a long shot. I think she might well have
won handily if she'd demonstrated any competence as VP, let alone the
Presidential candidate. But her unwillingness - or inability - to answer
any of the questions put to her along with her inability to articulate
policies or even specify anything she would do different to Biden soured
a LOT of people on her, people who would normally have voted for her
party. Add in the ludicrous demonization of Trump as a fascist and the
embodiment of Hitler and you've got more than enough to turn off a lot
of potential voters for the Democrats.

>
The only calling Trump Hitler was J.D. Vance.

             TROLL-O-METER
 
              5*    6*   *7
         4*                  *8
      3*                        *9
     2*                          *10
    1*              |             *stuporous
    0*             -*-            *catatonic
     *              |\            *comatose
      *               \          *clinical death
       *               \        *biological death
         *             _\/    *demonic apparition
             *     *     *damned for all eternity