Re: [OT] What's next for Kamala Harris?

BTR1701  <atropos@mac.com> wrote:

On Nov 18, 2024 at 11:00:03 AM PST, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <ahk@chinet.com>
wrote:
>

BTR1701  <atropos@mac.com> wrote:

On Nov 18, 2024 at 8:31:21 AM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
 

 On 11/18/2024 11:22 AM, BTR1701 wrote:

  On Nov 18, 2024 at 1:19:16 AM PST, "shawn"

<nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com>

  wrote:
 

  On Sun, 17 Nov 2024 21:29:19 -0800, The Horny Goat <lcraver@home.ca>
  wrote:
 

  On Fri, 15 Nov 2024 20:11:31 -0500, shawn
  <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
 

  The only calling Trump Hitler was J.D. Vance. So that should have
  turned off the Republicans if they really didn't want someone calling
  Trump Hitler or at least much like Hitler.

 
  Where did he call him Hitler? And don't tell me Vance's book - I
  finished it on the weekend and enjoyed it but more for raising my
  knowledge of poverty in America than for the politics.

 

>
>

https://www.cnn.com/2024/07/15/politics/kfile-jd-vance-comments-trump/index.html

 
  “I go back and forth between thinking Trump is a cynical asshole like
  Nixon who wouldn’t be that bad (and might even prove useful) or that
  he’s America’s Hitler,” Vance wrote in a message to a

friend in 2016.

  “How’s that for discouraging?”
 
  Just one of the articles mentioning Vance's referring to Trump as
  being like Hitler. Not that Vance would admit to it now, but it is in
  the public record that he did at one time think that way.

 
  Yeah, and Kamala called Joe a racist bigot during the Dem primary

debates,

  then she sang his praises once he nominated her VP.
 
  Politics.

 
 Seems "politics" blurs memory. She actually said Joe was *not* a racist.

 
LOL! She said, "I do not believe you are a racist", then proceeded to accuse
him of racist actions. She condemned him for working with segregationists in
the Senate, including choosing one of them to be his life-long mentor, and
also blasted him for opposing mandatory busing, which she deemed to be a
racist position on the issue.
 
You're all about detecting the unspoken wink-and-nod when it comes to Trump
allegedly inciting an insurrection despite actually telling the crowd to
protest peacefully, but your ability to detect the same when it comes to a
Democrat seems conveniently lacking.

 
Stop it. Did the Secret Service agent lie that he refused Trump's demand
to be taken to the Capitol? Trump intended to lead the crowd in.
 
Repeating myself: Trump's speech was TOO LATE.

>
Repeating myself: Trump told them to protest peacefully BEFORE the crowd even
left the Ellipse, before the marched to the Capitol.

What about all those people who went directly to the Capitol with ill
intent? What about all the people who could have been diverted from
heading toward Washington if Trump explicitly told them to turn back
several hours earlier?