Sujet : Re: [OT] Anatomy of a "non crime hate incident"
De : nobody (at) *nospam* nowhere.com (moviePig)
Groupes : rec.arts.tvDate : 07. Dec 2024, 21:50:35
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vj2ces$3ahbi$3@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 12/7/2024 4:47 AM, The Horny Goat wrote:
On Fri, 6 Dec 2024 17:29:31 -0500, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
wrote:
I can't conceive of government rationally saying something is perfectly legal
but we're not going to let you say it anyway.
>
E.g., something could be legal in isolation but intolerable in quantity.
Let's face it - if there had been only one person acting out on 6 Jan
2020 it would have been a non issue. There were of course rather more
people involved.
Sounds like an essential ingredient there might be 'conspiracy'.
[OT] Anatomy of a "non crime hate incident"
Re: [OT] Anatomy of a "non crime hate incident"