Re: This one didn't age quite so well

Liste des GroupesRevenir à ra tv 
Sujet : Re: This one didn't age quite so well
De : nanoflower (at) *nospam* notforg.m.a.i.l.com (shawn)
Groupes : rec.arts.tv
Date : 09. Dec 2024, 20:18:48
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <9igelj1v7rv2gidn9d6mj5ncv6hl151og0@4ax.com>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Mon, 9 Dec 2024 12:04:51 -0700, anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net>
wrote:

Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
https://youtu.be/s_b4xpWZb3c?si=0et5e5JWq-FcHicx
 
>
I don’t understood

I guess the point is they were removing the World Trade Center
buildings some years before they were truly removed. Just to show what
the digital technology could do to an image.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
9 Dec 24 * This one didn't age quite so well10Ubiquitous
9 Dec 24 +- Re: This one didn't age quite so well1shawn
9 Dec 24 `* Re: This one didn't age quite so well8Ubiquitous
10 Dec 24  +* Re: This one didn't age quite so well5shawn
11 Dec 24  i+- Re: This one didn't age quite so well1Adam H. Kerman
11 Dec 24  i+* Re: This one didn't age quite so well2shawn
11 Dec 24  ii`- Re: This one didn't age quite so well1Adam H. Kerman
11 Dec 24  i`- Re: This one didn't age quite so well1Ubiquitous
10 Dec 24  +- Re: This one didn't age quite so well1BTR1701
10 Dec 24  `- Re: This one didn't age quite so well1Ubiquitous

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal