Sujet : Re: [Overlord DVD] Star Trek Captains Ranked Best to Worst | My Response to the Screenrant Article That P***ED Me OFF!
De : weberm (at) *nospam* polaris.net (Ubiquitous)
Groupes : rec.arts.sf.tv rec.arts.startrek.misc rec.arts.tvDate : 11. Dec 2024, 10:30:45
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vjc1m9$1hi5n$5@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : WinVN 0.99.12N (x86 32bit)
In article <
54abbcef70efa7fd1163571900484266@hamiltonhall.info>,
john@hamiltonhall.info wrote:
>
>
In article <vit97m$1sevo$1@dont-email.me>, YourName@YourISP.com wrote:
On 2024-12-05 12:56:14 +0000, Blueshirt said:
Ubiquitous wrote:
>
https://screenrant.com/star-trek-captains-ranked/
7 Captain Jonathan Archer
6 Captain Michael Burnham
5 Captain Christopher Pike
4 Captain Benjamin Sisko
3 Captain James T. Kirk
2 Captain Kathryn Janeway
1 Captain Jean-Luc Picard
I don't like those results... I demand a recount.
I suspect there was an element of voter fraud in certain states.
>
There's a also lots of captains missing from the list.
>
I wouldn't even click on an article like that because I just know it will be
a woke joke of a list. Save myself the aggravation.
Yeah, just look who�s front and center in the picture! That�s a choice in
and of it�s self, even though she wasn�t actually picked as first.
-- Not a joke! Don't jump!
Re: [Overlord DVD] Star Trek Captains Ranked Best to Worst | My Response to the Screenrant Article That P***ED Me OFF!
Re: [Overlord DVD] Star Trek Captains Ranked Best to Worst | My Response to the Screenrant Article That P***ED Me OFF!
