Sujet : Re: The Mystery Drones
De : nobody (at) *nospam* nowhere.com (moviePig)
Groupes : rec.arts.tvDate : 15. Dec 2024, 04:28:54
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vjlidm$96hg$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 12/14/2024 9:10 PM, anim8rfsk wrote:
BTR1701 <no_email@invalid.invalid> wrote:
shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
On Sat, 14 Dec 2024 19:54:56 GMT, Ed Stasiak
<user1263@newsgrouper.org.uk.invalid> wrote:
>
>
Your Name
Ed Stasiak
>
True, though you're still going to court.
>
They are not U.S. military drones and don’t
appear to be from a foreign country or entity,
he said.
>
lol, "we don t know nuttin but they're perfectly safe, bro!"
>
As I've seen pointed out elsewhere the drones are likely being tested
by the military to carry material. So they can deny they are military
because they aren't armed but they are in development and secret so no
one is going to claim them. At least until one ends up crashing and
the government either has to deny they exist or admit it's one of
theirs.
>
Why in the blue fuck would the military test a secret material delivery
platform over heavily populated suburbia when practically the entire state
of Nevada is completely empty and available for testing such things away
from prying eyes?
>
Same reason they didn’t start building giant test, solar farms in Arizona
decades ago. Every time somebody tries to put through an appropriation the
representative from Kentucky block it saying that he should get it because
Kentucky gets as much sunshine as Arizona.
Maybe they mean 'moonshine'...