Re: ABC settles "rape" claim re: Pres. Elect.

On Thu, 19 Dec 2024 12:15:53 -0500, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
wrote:
 

On 12/19/2024 10:04 AM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:

super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:

On 2024-12-18 19:58:23 +0000, moviePig said:

>

. . .

>

Did the jury weigh in on the specific question of whether NY's legal
definition of 'rape' had been met, or was it an instruction to them?

>

I'm content to let Big Daddy go down in the history books as an
adjudicated sexual abuser instead of a convicted rapist. Because that's
what happened, there's no wiggling out of it by his apologists.

>
As super70s is relying on discussing facts as accurately reported, he's
unemployable as a member of the mainstream media. Too bad George
Stephanopolous chose to ignore the most basic tenets of journalism; he'd
have saved his employer $15 million.

>
He made a sincere (and for all practical purposes, piddling) error.  I'm
not sure why a simple retraction was judged insufficient.
>

 Over 10 times?
 Laughter.