Liste des Groupes | Revenir à ra tv |
On Sun, 22 Dec 2024 13:20:30 -0500, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>No, as I understand it, his homework was even done *for* him. But he chose to describe Trump as harshly as possible. It's unclear what verdict a full reckoning -- i.e., no "settlement" -- would've given.
wrote:
On 12/22/2024 10:26 AM, NoBody wrote:Are you now trying to say that Boy George gave an interview withoutOn Sat, 21 Dec 2024 11:28:18 -0500, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>>
wrote:
>On 12/21/2024 10:21 AM, NoBody wrote:>On Fri, 20 Dec 2024 13:10:29 -0500, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>>
wrote:
>On 12/20/2024 6:59 AM, NoBody wrote:>On Thu, 19 Dec 2024 12:19:59 -0500, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>>
wrote:
>On 12/19/2024 7:31 AM, NoBody wrote:>On Thu, 19 Dec 2024 01:31:39 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman">
<ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>BTR1701 <no_email@invalid.invalid> wrote:>suzeeq <suzeeq@imbris.com> wrote:>On 12/18/2024 4:28 AM, NoBody wrote:On Tue, 17 Dec 2024 11:57:19 -0500, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:>. . .>Your President-elect forcibly finger fucked her. Explain *that* fact.>Trump was not convicted of rape. ABC said he was. They lied.>End of story.>In other jurisdictions it's considered rape/But he wasn't in other jurisdictions.>
The harm to Donald Trump wws nominal. not $15 million worth.
ABC obviously felt otherwise given that they caved so quickly.
Umm... giant corporations don't piss off sitting Presidents, especially
not one who's vengeance-driven. It's bad business.
>
Enough about Biden. What about Trump? BTW Trump is not yet the
sitting President and it never stopped the media before so your claim
is ridiculous. ABC was caught in libel and paid big time. End of
story.
Not the "end of story" just because you stop reading.
>
You're welcome to explain it us how a jury finding Trump not guilty of
rape makes him guilty of it.
>
Laugher.
There's legal guilt, and then there's understood guilt. Trump escapes
the former only by a specific distinction in a specific jurisdiction.
>
Good grief. You can't state that someone was convicted of rape when
they weren't. That's libel.
Yes, if you knew they weren't. And iirc he said "found *liable* for
rape", not "convicted" ...which may have been raised as relevant.
>
doing his homework?
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.