Liste des Groupes | Revenir à ra tv |
suzeeq <suzeeq@imbris.com> wrote:No doubt, but there were several million less people then.On 1/9/2025 11:35 AM, danny burstein wrote:It literally has happened before. The Palisades burned in a very similarIn <rm80oj1c9filnvhokppl5afldcba1el0op@4ax.com> EGK <memyself@null.net> writes:Yeah, who can prepare for 80 mph wind in SoCalm in conjunction with
>On Thu, 9 Jan 2025 18:58:16 -0000 (UTC), danny burstein <dannyb@panix.com>>
wrote:>In <pu50ojla2af5rhitqg8db2labidg34qbio@4ax.com> EGK <memyself@null.net> writes:
>
[snip]
>Newsom claimed there was plenty of water but reports are water mains to>
fight the fires ran dry.
If you try really, really, hard, maybe you could figure out how
opening 250 hydrants near the reserviour might cause some problems
for the ones farther downstream.So again, they were totally unprepared for this.>
damn, you're dumb
>
fire. Never happened before.
katabatic wind event in the 1960s.
And there are Native American oral histories describing this sort of thing
going back almost a thousand years.
Every government official or media pundit telling you this is
'unprecedented' is either incompetent and/or lying to cover up for their
incompetence.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.