Re: OT: Sturgeon General warns even moderate drinking causes cancer

Liste des GroupesRevenir à ra tv 
Sujet : Re: OT: Sturgeon General warns even moderate drinking causes cancer
De : YourName (at) *nospam* YourISP.com (Your Name)
Groupes : rec.arts.tv
Date : 14. Jan 2025, 22:22:14
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vm6ki5$2j94o$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Unison/2.2
On 2025-01-14 08:14:20 +0000, Pluted Pup said:
On Mon, 13 Jan 2025 21:28:53 -0800, Your Name wrote:
On 2025-01-14 02:54:29 +0000, Pluted Pup said:
On Mon, 13 Jan 2025 17:11:17 -0800, Your Name wrote:
On 2025-01-13 22:23:56 +0000, The Horny Goat said:
On Thu, 09 Jan 2025 04:30:44 -0500, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net>
wrote:
In article<vlbfel$g7qt$1@dont-email.me>, super70s@super70s.invalid wrote:
 And living to 100 causes death!
 Reminds me of back in the 70s and 80s when they were always coming out with something causing cancer, a friend of mine would say "next they'll be telling us fresh mountain water causes cancer."
 Just another attempt by leftists to reintroduce Prohibition without passing laws or changing the Constitution...
 The Left? The Left loves recruiting kids to alcohol
and drug use, to "break" them from their squareness.
 
I guess I must be a zombie then since I drank a 750ml bottle of wine
on New Year's Eve (and subsequently paid for it but it's once a year).
And it was a variety that has a rather higher alcohol content than
usual to - I'm a big guy but was floating in my chair by the time I
went to bed. (Haven't had a drop since)
 Like anything else, alcohol can be good in some wasy and bad in others,
when used sensibly.
 Like cigarettes?
 I meant in the sense of food and drink.
 Alcohol is a drug, not a food.
Nope. Alcohol is a drink. It can be addictive from some people, but it's not a drug.

True, but the constantly changing opinons based on these idiotic and
flawed studies *ARE* stupid (as well as a massive waste of time and
money).
 The media changes it's opinions based on promotion, not facts.
The media is so into sensationalism that it often slaps misleading
headlines to articles, to help spread confusion.
It's not the media running the silly studies and continually changing their minds about whether something is good for you or bad for you. The media only reports the results of the study (often with misleading headlines) that they've been given in a media release.
The silly studies themselves are run by universities and medical research companies. The problm is their methodology is flawed and the results statistically manipulated ... just like all polls, surveys, and studies.

Also like anything else, alcohol taken in excessive amounts will be bad
for you.
 And like cigarettes, causes cancer. Teaching kids to drink
is like teaching kids to smoke.
 Personally I can't even stand the stench of alcohol to bother drinking
it, but as long as people drink it *sensibly* there is no real danger
to it and it can have some beneficial effects.
 As studies have long shown, alcohol is harmful as a beverage,
it causes cancer, for example.
That's one of the bad potential effects when drinking it in excessive amounts.
But there is nothing wrong with alcohol when used *sensibly*, and in some ways it can be beneficial. Just like any other food or drink, if you're stupid enough to go to excessive amounts, you will cause yourself problems.

The "studies" that claimed moderate drinking is better for you were
all bogus because they shoved the ill, ex-alcoholics, etc.,
into the abstainer category. Someone who came down with liver
disease from drinking and became an abstainer would be counted in
these studiesas a non-drinker, rather than an ex-drinker.
These biased "studies" ignored people's drinking histories.
In reality an ex-drinker has a greater risk of cancer than a
never-drinker, just like an ex-smoker has a greater risk of cancer
than a never-smoker.
 This is just like as if they ignored someone's smoking history
if they were currently non-smoking, but they don't, they count
an ex-smoker as an ex-smoker. No one is saying that one
cigarette a day is better for you, and so should no one say that
about drinking.
As I said, the studies are flawed, making them all at best worthless wastes of time and money, and at worst can be highly dangerous (partly thanks to the media reporting them).
One 'good' example is the idiotic study and reports that people should "drink 8 glasses of water a day". After the silly study was reported in the media, some people took it to extremes, including some people who died from drinking too much water.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
14 Jan 25 * Re: OT: Sturgeon General warns even moderate drinking causes cancer10Your Name
14 Jan 25 +* Re: OT: Sturgeon General warns even moderate drinking causes cancer7Pluted Pup
14 Jan 25 i`* Re: OT: Sturgeon General warns even moderate drinking causes cancer6Your Name
14 Jan 25 i +* Re: OT: Sturgeon General warns even moderate drinking causes cancer4Pluted Pup
14 Jan 25 i i`* Re: OT: Sturgeon General warns even moderate drinking causes cancer3Your Name
14 Jan 25 i i `* Re: OT: Sturgeon General warns even moderate drinking causes cancer2Pluted Pup
14 Jan 25 i i  `- Re: OT: Sturgeon General warns even moderate drinking causes cancer1Your Name
20 Jan 25 i `- Re: OT: Sturgeon General warns even moderate drinking causes cancer1Adam H. Kerman
19 Jan 25 `* Re: OT: Sturgeon General warns even moderate drinking causes cancer2shawn
19 Jan 25  `- Re: OT: Sturgeon General warns even moderate drinking causes cancer1moviePig

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal