Re: Re: Will Late Night Roast Newsom And Bass For Fires? Don’tHold Your Breath.

On Jan 17, 2025 at 2:08:17 AM PST, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:

BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:

On Jan 14, 2025 at 11:01:09 AM PST, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

On 1/13/2025 3:08 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

On Jan 13, 2025 at 9:24:37 AM PST, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

 

Afaik, 'climate change' doesn't start fires, it continues them.

 

California has been known for massive wildfires...

 

Fyi, last night Jon Stewart read your presentation.  Essentially.

 

Did he mention the new factoid I heard on CNN-- that this L.A. wildfire has
released more carbon into the atmosphere than all of the cars and trucks in
America released in all of 2024?

 

So if the Newsoms and the Bass's and the AOCs of the world are really as
concerned about 'climate change' as they claim to be (and aren't just using
it
as an excuse to control people and remake society to their socialist
liking), then they should be all-in on anything that would prevent these
fires-- desalination plants, timber harvesting, chaparral clearance,
constructing and filling reservoirs with water instead of flushing it into
the
sea, etc.

 

What do you want to bet that won't be the case?

 
I think you missed the point. Atmospheric carbon is bad only if it's
from burning a fossil fuel, not from burning new-growth scrub or
forest.

Ah, it's like artificial electricity! The carbon is somehow 'different' if it
comes from gasoline than if it comes from a burning house or tree. Gotcha.

Clod is sorely missed around here. We've been adrift in the darkness without
her here to explain the fundamentals of nature to us.