Sujet : Triumph of national security at Supreme Court
De : ahk (at) *nospam* chinet.com (Adam H. Kerman)
Groupes : rec.arts.tvDate : 17. Jan 2025, 19:48:20
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vme8lk$5rq6$1@dont-email.me>
User-Agent : trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
Korematsu lives!
The Biden administration argued that Chinese ownship of the TikTok
platform is a threat to national security. The Supreme Court agreed. In
a unanimous ruling, the law banning Chinese ownership was not found to
be unconstitutional.
During Trump's first presidency, he made that very national security
argument and lobbied members of Congress to support the law. Now it
appears he may not enforce the ban.
TikTok argued its own free speech liberty was infringed. However, it's
those who post to the platoform who are literally publishers themselves
don't have a First Amendment right to choose where and how to publish.
I'm so confused, for distribution is part of publishing amd, if
distribution is infringed upon, we used to call that censorship. Well,
no more.
moviePig triumphs hugely here.
https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-tiktok-china-security-speech-166f7c794ee587d3385190f893e52777