Sujet : Re: Remember That Empty Reservoir in L.A.?
De : atropos (at) *nospam* mac.com (BTR1701)
Groupes : rec.arts.tvDate : 19. Jan 2025, 19:30:12
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vmjgbk$2dt9m$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Usenapp/0.92.2/l for MacOS
On Jan 18, 2025 at 9:25:30 PM PST, "suzeeq" <
suzeeq@imbris.com> wrote:
On 1/18/2025 8:12 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
Well, it's still empty and the Santa Anas are expected to kick up again next
week.
Bad enough that it was empty the first time around but they've had two weeks
to fill it and not one drop has been sent up there in that time.
The three million gallons LAFD had to work with before the hydrants ran dry
lasted them 17 hours. If they'd had the 117 million gallons in that
reservoir
available, a little quick math indicates it would have lasted 663 hours
before
running out. That's 28 days.
Oh, and have I mentioned that we only have half the fire department we need?
The National Fire Institute, which sets standards for municipal fire
departments nationwide, says you need 1.8 firefighters for every 1000
residents. Los Angeles has 0.9. Exactly half of what a city this size needs.
We're also 62 fire stations short of what is recommended. Sixty-fucking-two.
But never fear! We've met and *exceeded* our quota of DEI executives, so
that's reassuring.
I swear to god, these 'progressive' Democrats in charge of the place are
actively trying to destroy the city. I mean, if it was your goal to destroy
Los Angeles, what would you do differently?
I thought it was under repair? Maybe they're not done yet and ready to
fill it.
The cover was under repair, not the reservoir. A job that should have taken
two weeks at most, yet the reservoir was empty for at least 11 months.
Without the cover, the water isn't certified for drinking, but it sure as hell
can still put a fire out.