Liste des Groupes | Revenir à ra tv |
Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:It was written then and there was no space program.Ian J. Ball <ijball@mac.invalid> wrote:So what about the book requires it to be set in the 50s?On 1/20/25 1:18 PM, Dimensional Traveler wrote:>On 1/20/2025 9:53 AM, Ian J. Ball wrote:>What did you watch?>'Moonraker'. And yes, the physics ARE complete male bovine digestive
end product but its still a fun flick. :)I have it on good authority that "Moonraker" is the best Bond film,>
EVAH!! ;p
I despise this movie on principle that they made such a horrid
adaptation of Fleming's best novel. All they had to do was set the movie
story in the 1950s, same as the novel, and it would have been a great
movie. We don't need Bond In Space in, essentially, a remake of major
elements of You Only Live Twice and The Spy Who Loved Me.
>
Why not set the movie in the 1950s? There's absolutely no continuity.
>
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.