Re: Riley Gaines advocates for women!

On 1/27/2025 12:03 AM, BTR1701 wrote:

On Jan 26, 2025 at 7:56:12 PM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
 

On 1/26/2025 9:34 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

  On Jan 26, 2025 at 3:53:51 PM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
 

  On 1/26/2025 6:23 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

    On Jan 26, 2025 at 3:01:51 PM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
   

    On 1/26/2025 1:55 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

      On Jan 25, 2025 at 9:57:03 PM PST, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <ahk@chinet.com>
    wrote:
     

      Riley Gaines slams Democrats. Republicans take the moral high ground.
>
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kItskvsbizI

            Love Riley. She speaks facts.

>
    What law forces a declaration of gender at birth?

        I'm not sure what video you watched, but this one was about a law stopping
    grown men from sexually assaulting female athletes by exposing
themselves in
    women's private restrooms and changing rooms, and keeping men from taking
    trophies, scholarships, and other benefits in sports by pretending to be
    women.
        This is not a law about forcing declarations of gender at birth.

>
  Maybe I misunderstood.  I thought the issue came down to who's male and
  who's female, with the debatable certainty of one or the other.

    If you're a female athlete and there's a penis wagging in your face in the
  women's locker room, it's pretty certain what the problem is there.

>
I'm not sure it *is* all that certain.

 Of course you're not. What's brutally obvious to normal people continually
eludes you.
 

   E.g., *any* uninvited crotch in
*anyone's* face is problematic.  Regardless, I think the particular
social mores you want enforced would need you to define, in unambiguous
legalese, who's male and who's female.  Imo, that won't be trivial.

Rather than resort to ad hominem, why not state the "brutally obvious"?