Re: OT: "Free speech" becomes a verb & noun...

On Thu, 30 Jan 2025 20:59:41 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
wrote:

On Jan 30, 2025 at 12:25:24 PM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>

On 1/30/2025 2:55 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:

 BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:

 Jan 30, 2025 3:56:42 AM PST, Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:

 On 2025-01-29 11:59 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

 On Jan 29, 2025 at 8:37:20 PM PST, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

 

 "Trump administration to cancel student visas of pro-Palestinian
 protesters"

 

 
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-administration-cancel-student-visas-all-hamas-sympathizers-white-house-2025-01-29/

 

 It's a deportable offense under the U.S. Code for a resident alien to
 advocate for or express support for a terrorist organization.

 

 moviePig doesn't care about the LAW!

 

 Apparently for the Pigs of the world, that's yet another law we're just
 supposed to ignore, along with the near entirety of the U.S. Code dealing
 immigration law.

 

 And he had four years under Biden to bask in it because Biden was straight
up
 ignoring a whole host of laws that conflicted with the Agenda.

 
 I am curious: What if an illegal alien said or wrote something that
 offended moviePig's sensibilities? In his zeal to suppress speech/press,
 would he then have them deported?

 
Adam (indeed curiouser and curiouser) seems not to grasp who's
suppressing free speech here...

>
The Supreme Court ruled long ago that the law banning resident aliens from
endorsing and supporting terrorist organizations is constitutional and not a
violation of the 1st Amendment.

But there is a difference between supporting Palestinians and
supporting Hamas. It seems that many that are potentially being
targeted here claim to only support the Palestinian people and not
Hamas or the actions of Hamas.