Sujet : Re: [OT] Canada is not a serious country
De : no_offline_contact (at) *nospam* example.com (Rhino)
Groupes : rec.arts.tvDate : 07. Feb 2025, 21:40:07
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vo5r39$35pb9$3@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 2025-02-07 11:07 AM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:
I read this story in the National Post and found myself shaking my head:
https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/syrian-canadian-who-allegedly-let-relative-use-his-passport-wins-chance-to-get-it-back
This guy seriously misused his passport - from the looks of it, very
deliberately - and the court has essentially said it was mean of the
passport office to treat him the way they did.
They SHOULD have deported both individuals and never let them back into
the country: that's what a serious country would have done.
I agree with you. The justice's opinion misrepresents the evidence
presented by the government. How does the justice confuse which stamps
on the passport were referred to? Everything arrival and departure is
stamped and noted for a clear timeline of presentation of a passport to
immigration officers.
This is what happens when you hire Social Justice Warrior activists as judges. It has to stop! These judges need to lose their jobs.
-- Rhino