Re: Now LEGO BLOCKS Can Discriminate Over Their Parts?!

Liste des GroupesRevenir à ra tv 
Sujet : Re: Now LEGO BLOCKS Can Discriminate Over Their Parts?!
De : nobody (at) *nospam* nowhere.com (moviePig)
Groupes : rec.arts.tv
Date : 09. Feb 2025, 21:37:01
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vob3ld$qa73$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 2/9/2025 2:45 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Feb 9, 2025 at 10:37:20 AM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
 
This is an example of applying heteronormative language to topics
unrelated to gender, sex and reproduction. It illustrates how
heteronormativity (the idea that heterosexuality and the male/female
gender binary are the norm and everything that falls outside is unusual)
 That's literally true. Heterosexuality *is* the norm. They're arguing here
that something that's true shouldn't be true.
It's the "norm" in the sense of "usual, typical, or standard" -- and, afaics, what's being demonstrated here is how pervasive that 'norm' is. What *isn't* explicitly addressed is how 'norm' often becomes "normal".

Date Sujet#  Auteur
9 Feb 25 * Re: Now LEGO BLOCKS Can Discriminate Over Their Parts?!9Adam H. Kerman
9 Feb 25 +* Re: Now LEGO BLOCKS Can Discriminate Over Their Parts?!2BTR1701
9 Feb 25 i`- Re: Now LEGO BLOCKS Can Discriminate Over Their Parts?!1Adam H. Kerman
9 Feb 25 `* Re: Now LEGO BLOCKS Can Discriminate Over Their Parts?!6moviePig
9 Feb 25  `* Re: Now LEGO BLOCKS Can Discriminate Over Their Parts?!5BTR1701
9 Feb 25   +* Re: Now LEGO BLOCKS Can Discriminate Over Their Parts?!2Adam H. Kerman
9 Feb 25   i`- Re: Now LEGO BLOCKS Can Discriminate Over Their Parts?!1moviePig
9 Feb 25   `* Re: Now LEGO BLOCKS Can Discriminate Over Their Parts?!2moviePig
9 Feb 25    `- Re: Now LEGO BLOCKS Can Discriminate Over Their Parts?!1Your Name

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal