Re: Even I Will Admit Trump and DOGE May Have Overstepped Here

On Feb 17, 2025 at 2:36:56 PM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
 

On 2/17/2025 4:57 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

  On Feb 17, 2025 at 1:50:47 PM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
 

  On 2/17/2025 3:35 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

    On Feb 17, 2025 at 12:14:45 PM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
   

    On 2/17/2025 12:17 AM, BTR1701 wrote:

      On Feb 16, 2025 at 8:18:23 PM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com>
wrote:
     

      On 2/16/2025 7:01 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

        On Feb 16, 2025 at 2:26:53 PM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com>
  wrote:
       

        On 2/16/2025 4:05 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

          On Feb 16, 2025 at 12:08:53 PM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com>
    wrote:
         

          On 2/16/2025 1:32 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

            On Feb 16, 2025 at 10:29:53 AM PST, "suzeeq"
    <suzeeq@imbris.com> wrote:
           

            On 2/16/2025 10:18 AM, BTR1701 wrote:

>
            Found another one. How can Trump be doing this? Doesn't he
    know the harm
            he's doing to the nation?
                            @philllyfanatic:
                    "I was fired from my job at USAID today. I worked in the Tootsie Pop
      department. After 20 years of research and $28.3 million later, we were
      *this* close to finding out exactly how many licks it takes
to get to the
        Tootsie Roll center of a Tootsie Pop. Now we will
probably never know."
             

            I think the guy is having you on.

                        What? You mean the Tootsie Pop Department isn't a real thing?!?
                        My world view is shattered!

>
          A world view based on pseudo-examples was never whole.

                    It was a joke. Sheesh. The stereotypes about leftists being dour,
          humor-impaired killjoys are alive and well.

>
        It's a joke that purports to characterize and justify destruction of
        USAID.  An actual example should be even funnier.

                You're becoming FPP, who always claimed that if he didn't find a joke
    funny,
        that made him unable to discern it as a joke at all.
                Most normal people can detect jokes even if they don't personally find
    them
        funny.

>
      *This* joke suggests that USAID comprises ridiculous boondoggles.

            (1) It apparently does.

>
    So this "joke" claims, which is funny only if you "know" it's true.
>

      (2) Since when do jokes have to be strictly factual?

>
    One that's not is propaganda.

        LOL!
        Wherein moviePig wins the Sandra Fluke Humor Police Award:
        https://ibb.co/j9r6J4fH
   

         It's "evidence" to an audience who has no idea what USAID actually
      comprises.

            Oh, I see. You're just doing a public service, fact-checking jokes
for the
      smooth brains in the RAT audience who otherwise would be taken in by my
      humorous "misinformation". I'm sure they're pleased to know to what
esteem
    you
      hold their intelligence.
            Much like the jokes from the Babylon Bee consistently get
  "fact-checked" by
      the mainstream media, who strangely don't feel the need to fact-check
      similarly satirical and exaggerated articles by the left-leaning Onion.

>
    Is there a wide view that USAID promotes only bogus projects?

        Not only but enough to be a serious problem that needs to be addressed.

>
  This sounds suspiciously like the "even one is too many" argument.  Do
  you actually know what fraction of USAID projects are plainly bogus
  ...or do you take the word of of demagogues stoking a mob?
>

    I'm aware  of only the DEI Irish musical you've singled out as patently
    risible, and it doesn't fit the profile your joke targets.

        Well, you could just review the earlier posts in this thread for more
  examples
    than the Irish musical.
        I just learned of another one: Millions spent to produce an Afghan version
  of
    SESAME STREET.

>
  How much *should* an Afghan version of 'Sesame Street' cost?  Or perhaps
     one dollar is too much?

    It should cost the U.S. taxpayer nothing. If the Afghans want Big Bird and
  Oscar, they can pay for it themselves.

>
I doubt that the Afghans *do* want it or even know about it.  I'd assume
we're trying to expose their kids to it and its values.

 Then they can watch the decades worth of re-runs we already have.