Sujet : Re: The weak kneed "doge" website
De : weberm (at) *nospam* polaris.net (Ubiquitous)
Groupes : rec.arts.tvDate : 27. Feb 2025, 10:30:46
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vppml0$33mib$6@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : WinVN 0.99.12N (x86 32bit)
In article <
vpoc2k$2puih$2@dont-email.me>,
atropos@mac.com wrote:
"Pluted Pup" <plutedpup@outlook.com> wrote:
On Wed, 26 Feb 2025 09:54:09 -0800, BTR1701 wrote:
On Feb 25, 2025 at 10:00:29 PM PST, "Pluted Pup"<plutedpup@outlook.com>
wrote:
> Where is the actual intention to cut down waste?
>
> Let us pretend that USAID, for example, gave 90 million
> dollars to support homeless shelters for trans teens in
> El Salvador and you feel that that is an example of
> government waste. But how could you actually tell whether it is
> waste or not just because the premise seems wacky? Like with
> TV and movies, premise is easy, it's what you actually do
> and not what you said you intend to do that counts.
Well, if the money was appropriated for homeless shelters for trans
teens in El Salvador and you spend it on homeless shelters for trans
teens in El Salvador, then that's prima facie waste since American
taxpayers have no business funding homeless shelters for trans teens
in El Salvador.
Even if it's for national security?
>
LOL!
Jebus, these leftists are far too predictible.
-- Not a joke! Don't jump!